SBIR/STTR Research Award

EFFECTIVE ROOM TEMPERATURE DENTAL HANDPIECE STERILIZER

Award identifier a750df9dc435661488b63a6e24895e63bf090ec23573468e73f47d892e13ce1bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$814,645

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
GOLKOWSKI CZESLAW
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FHYTCFFJWYQ8
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): We propose to research and develop a novel, reliable, and affordable technology for effective sterilization of Dental Handpieces (DH) at room temperature. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends that these del icate instruments be heat- sterilized between patients to reduce the risk of disease transmission. While autoclaving is the most versatile of these methods, many materials and instruments suffer irreversible damage when exposed to moist heat at the tempera tures and for the times required for sterilization. After several sterilization cycles, moist heat shortens the useful life of most Dental tools. Moist heat sterilization rapidly corrodes metal instruments and dulls blades. The technology utilizes a non-co rrosive gas sterilant produced in a free radical source to sterilize a wide range of materials and surfaces. The air/gas stream containing free radicals produced in the source will even be able to penetrate and efficiently sterilize instruments such as han dpiece inner channels. The proposed sterilization technology is safe, will not require chemicals, and will be simple in operation and maintenance free. Its simplicity and affordability resulting from operating at low-temperature and with low energy require ments make it very suitable for developing a sterilization device for use in many Dental offices. During Phase I tests, an air stream containing free radicals produced in the source system effectively inactivated 100% of highly concentrated microorganisms in spore form deposited inside the narrowest DH channel at the temperature of the sterilization process maintained below 30oC in time less than 10 minutes. During Phase I of the program, material compatibility were assessed and proved that the technology i s safe for DH. .High quality care at lowest possible cost creates a necessity of development of new safe, cheap sterilization technologies. Sterilization of Dental Handpieces (DHs), is currently one of the important issues in Dental care, since these preci sion instruments, costing about 1,000 each, need to be sterilized between patients. The proposed development of the effective, room temperature sterilization technology offers cheap alternative to autoclaving.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

15 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2021). Reported award amounts total $3,975,550. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.