SBIR/STTR Research Award

GIR Antagonists: Novel Feeding/Catabolism Molecules

Award identifier 6bc74076b0c47030ae66ee1f24bbde5bca3649d0e3a154e1b23596df125cbcf1Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$174,407

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
P2D, INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
KX3EAX2JEMV8
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Obesity has risen to epidemic proportions in the United States, contributing to over 52 billion USD per year in direct medical costs. Limited treatment options and significant side effects of currently used Pharmaceuticals necessitate the search for new and better pharmaceutical targets. P2D, Inc. has developed for immediate testing, non-peptide small molecule antagonists of a novel feeding target, glucocorticoid-induced receptor (GIR; GPCR 83). GIR is a neuropeptide Y-like receptor that binds anorectic peptide PYY3-36 as well as synthetic peptide T-100. Preliminary studies of the lead compound, T-100 (US patents 6013633 & 6235718 Bl), demonstrate that T-100 significantly attenuates food intake in rats using different feeding paradigms. This Phase 1 SBIR will test non-peptide small molecules, PD1-PD10, derived from T-100 structure-activity assessment of the GIR pharmacophore. First, compounds will be tested for GIR binding and antagonism of GIR-mediated signal transduction via phospho-CREB. The most potent of these small molecule GIR antagonists will then undergo in vivo testing with a goal to achieve the 80% reduction of feeding seen with T-100, with better CNS penetration and bioavailability properties. These goals will be achieved under the following Aims, Specific Aim 1: Compounds PD1 through PD10 will be tested for biological activity in vitro using a cell line (GIRD7) that expresses the novel NPY-like receptor GIR. Compounds PD1 to PD10 will be tested for binding to GIR expressed in GIRD7 cells by competition assays and for antagonism of pCREB- induced luciferase activation mediated by GIR in GIRD7 cells. Efficacy of non-peptide compounds for binding and functional antagonism of GIR will be compared to that observed for peptide antagonist T-100. Specific Aim 2: In vivo testing of drug candidates in animal models of feeding behavior and energy expenditure. The three most potent candidates (as determined by Specific Aim 1) will be tested in rats for effects on food intake, energy expenditure, conditioned taste aversion. CNS penetration and dose- response behavior will be evaluated in two routes of administration, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v). vs. intraperitoneal (i.p.) T-100 will be employed as a positive control.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

52 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2021). Reported award amounts total $21,593,440. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.