SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase II: Fostering Growth in Trusting Relationships between Students and Educators with Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Technologies

Award identifier a23a9ba76cbf77ca359f4b31d9562c4e30f352300c12731a4a0ad6e9b5ec258cAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$1,250,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2026

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SOWN TO GROW, INC.
Proposal award date
2026-07-16
Contract end date
2028-07-31
UEI
GYZAA15MJKZ5
Solicitation number
NSF 24-580
Topic code
LC

Research abstract

The broader/commercial impact of this SBIR Phase II project is to improve student well-being, academic outcomes, and educator effectiveness by making the quality of student-teacher relationships visible, measurable, and actionable at scale. Strong relationships between students and educators are among the most powerful predictors of student outcomes, yet many schools today lack practical tools to assess or support these relationships in real time at scale. This project addresses that gap by developing artificial intelligence-powered features that help teachers respond more meaningfully to students, help students deepen their reflective practice, and help school administrators identify where relationships are thriving or need support. The technology is delivered through a software-as-a-service platform. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary dataset of millions of real student reflections and teacher responses, which underpins machine learning models that no competitor can easily replicate. This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II project advances the application of natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to measure and support the quality of student-teacher relationships in K-12 educational settings. Despite the well-documented importance of these relationships, scalable methods for assessing their depth have been largely absent. Phase I established the technical feasibility of this approach by developing and validating three rubric-based classification frameworks. Phase II builds upon this foundation across three research objectives: productizing Phase I model outputs into user-facing tools including student nudges, teacher prioritization features, and administrator dashboards; strengthening the technical infrastructure by expanding models to handle dynamic student populations, improving model robustness, and transitioning to real-time inference; and embedding personalized, context-aware teacher coaching directly into educator workflows. Anticipated outcomes include improved quality of student reflections and teacher responses, a robust real-time AI infrastructure, and a scalable model. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2026). Reported award amounts total $3,949,538. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Science Foundation, Department of Education

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.