SBIR/STTR Research Award

Atrogin-1 inhibitors for Muscle Wasting

Award identifier 68e3eea463009fe326129c40a2f84be591685c2a8ca276ce7d8f71876809479dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$249,102

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
PROGENRA INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Z3JKMHXHFHJ6
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Muscle atrophy (wasting) is a serious clinical complication of diabetes and other chronic pathoses, leading to increased morbidity and reduced life expectancy. While symptoms have been addressed by a number of interventions, no successful therapy has been developed. Recently, various proteins whose expression is enhanced under conditions of atrophy-inducing starvation have been identified in rats. In particular, the expression of a set of novel genes called atrogins (atrophy-specific genes) increases significantly in skeletal muscles of fasting organisms and decreases rapidly when feeding is resumed. The product of one of these genes - atrogin-1 - is an F-box protein ubiquitin E3 ligase, a critical enzyme of the ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation pathway. This pathway is implicated in muscle atrophy, since proteasome inhibitors protect against muscle wasting in model systems. Selective attenuation of proteasomal activity associated with muscle wasting may be achievable using inhibitors of atrogin-1. In Phase 1, E3 ubiquitination activity of atrogin-1 ectopically expressed in yeast will be demonstrated against a known substrate, calcineurin. Then, a yeast-based assay for atrogin-1 will be developed and validated, in preparation for high throughput screening of compound and natural products collections to discover inhibitors of atrogin-1 in Phase 2. For the assay, the following will be cloned and expressed in yeast S. cerevisiae: the substrate of atrogin-1, fused to p53 linked to a beta-galactosidase reporter; atrogin-1 E3 ligase complex; and an E3 ligase suitable as a selectivity control. Results of pilot experiments to validate this modular assay demonstrate that human E3 ligases, p-53 activated reporter plasmid, and p53-fused ligase substrate ectopically expressed in yeast give a null signal, but produce a robust reporter signal when E3 ligase is left out, consistent with ubiquitination/degradation of fused p53 by E3. Successful completion of Phase 1 should result in a validated screening assay that can be utilized in Phase 2. In Phase 2, active principles will be isolated from the best extract leads, with the goal of identifying novel, potent, and selective inhibitors of atrogin-1 for development as adjuvant therapy of muscle wasting associated with diabetes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

53 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2025). Reported award amounts total $22,552,905. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.