SBIR/STTR Research Award

Focused Collimator for Dual Modality Breast Imaging

Award identifier cd99b081f0e863f480adb77460c40420be53983d55f05ebefd7aa3415b4186b7Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$587,680

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
CREATV MICROTECH INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
R9KLWUK6L2B7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Mammography is currently the gold standard for breast screening. However, the positive predictive value (fraction of cases identified as positive by mammography that truly are positive) is only 20 - 25%. Thus the vast majority of breast biopsies performed are negative. Biopsy is a very unpleasant experience for many, especially when it is a false positive. Researchers at the University of Virginia at Charlottesville (UVa) have developed a new diagnostic breast scanner by combining digital x-ray mammography and scintimammography, using a dedicated small field-of-view gamma camera, on a common gantry. In scintimammography, technetium-99m sestamibi is injected intravenously and concentrates preferentially at the site of malignant tumor. Early clinical evaluation of the dual modality scanner has shown promising results for more accurate diagnosis especially for small masses. The current dual modality scanner utilizes a mammography system, to which has been attached a parallel hole collimator and a gamma camera. Thus, each pixel in the gamma camera views a ray path perpendicular to the gamma detector surface, while each pixel in the x-ray detector views a ray path focused at the point source. This geometric discrepancy produces co-registration errors, especially for thick breasts and for masses lying near the top of the breast limiting the full benefit of the dual imaging diagnostic approach. The specific aims for this Phase I Small Business Innovation Program (SBIR) proposal are to (a) produce small focused collimators for the system currently at UVa, (b) to develop a microfabrication method using a sensitive, cost effective photoresist as the electroforming mold to fabricate the focused collimator, and (c) to evaluate co-registration using focused collimators on the UVa system. The specific aims for the Phase II SBIR are (a) to design an improved dual modality breast imaging system based on the experimental data of Phase I, (b) to fabricate a full-size mammography collimator appropriate for the new system, and (c) to test the dual modality breast imaging system incorporating the full-size collimator.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2019). Reported award amounts total $11,419,260. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.