SBIR/STTR Research Award

ELECTROMECHANICAL NONINVASIVE NEURAL STIMULATION: SAFETY AND EFFICACY

Award identifier 99cd0ed9ad22934e90d612c1dc9d2ef8b4972a984a2489a507b57a3b30df1a6eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$417,320

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
HIGHLAND INSTRUMENTS INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YVB2H8MCWWX7
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The past decade has seen a rapid increase in the application of brain stimulation devices to treat a variety of movement disorders and other neuropathologies. Present noninvasive technologies suffer from fundamental li mitations and have yet to reach the level of efficacy of invasive methods, such as deep brain stimulation. Electromechanical Stimulation (EMS) is an improved noninvasive modality, which offers the potential of noninvasive deep brain stimulation. Preliminar y experiments with this technique have revealed improved focality and penetration compared to other forms of noninvasive stimulation. The work proposed in this study will explore fundamental efficacy and safety criteria related to the technique. The first study component will evaluate the efficacy of EMS, where recordings will be made of the combined local visual evoked potential (VEP)/ electroencephalogram (EEG) from area 17 of anaesthetized adult cats immediately following electromechanical stimulation an d compared with baseline, SHAM stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and mechanical stimulation (MS). A statistical analysis will be performed to characterize the signal properties of the VEP/ EEG data and determine the effect of electromechanical stimulation on neural response (as a function of magnitude, depth, and duration of effect). It is hypothesized that electromechanical stimulation will result in a significantly larger amplification of the VEP response and power in the EEG signal relative to the other methods of stimulation, a measurable effect in deep brain regions for which other stimulation methods are ineffective, and a significantly longer response duration in comparison to these ot her techniques. The second component of the study, focused on the safety of the technique, will assess tissue temperature and histology changes to electromechanical stimulation. Animal cortices will be exposed to extended durations of EMS stimulation and e valuated for thermodynamic changes, via implanted micro-thermocouple measurements, and histological changes, via an array of histological staining methods to look for patterns of cell loss or gliosis, and white matter damage and degeneration (myelin). We h ypothesize that electromechanical stimulated tissue will be indistinguishable from the non-stimulated tissue and that tissue temperature changes from stimulation will be physiologically insignificant. The final component of this study will assess EMS's eff icacy in modifying functional patterns of brain activity by means of high resolution 14[C]2-deoxyglucose imaging (2DG). We will compare these results to 2-DG data previously developed for other stimulation modalities (such as TMS and tDCS) to assess the me tabolic and functional effects of EMS (in terms of magnitude, focality, and time). We hypothesize that EMS will demonstrate greater focality, depth of penetration, and magnitude of effect compared to other simulation modalities. Future developments with th is technology could provide a platform for innovative and improved neurological treatments while simultaneously providing a tremendous market opportunity. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE Brain stimulation devices are used to treat a variety of neurologic and psyc hiatric disorders. Highland Instruments' Electromechanical Stimulation (EMS) is a noninvasive neurostimulation method which improves upon current noninvasive technologies with superior focality, targeting control, and penetration, and for the first time of fers the possibility of noninvasive deep brain stimulation (i.e., stimulating deep brain structures without maximally stimulating the surface). The technology could benefit patients with movement disorders and other neuropathologies who are currently not s erved by present noninvasive options.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2008–2025). Reported award amounts total $17,502,850. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.