SBIR/STTR Research Award

a novel cardiovascular stent for the intrinsic reduction of restenosis and thromb

Award identifier 0a6318b23744c677094b3c65c64a43316dd229a9def0dc8d802a52899e7c9116Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,983

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
VASCULAR PROFLIX, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): One-third of adults in the U.S. and throughout the world suffer from some form of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The use of bare-metal coronary stents (BMS) for the treatment of CVD increased by 147% from 1996 to 2000, s uch that 65-80% of treatments now involve stent implantation. Unfortunately restenosis limits the success of BMS in approximately 30-51% of patients. These cases require revascularization of the restenotic lesion and have cost the U.S. healthcare system an estimated 2.5 billion dollars since 1999. Until recently, drug-eluting stents (DES) designed to combat restenosis were being used with such frequency that the global market for stents increased to over 5.4 billion dollars. The efficacy of these devices is now in question since the associated antiproliferative agents used to prevent restenosis also make the vessel prone to late thrombosis that increases the likelihood of myocardial infarction. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that there is an urgent need to reevaluate the current paradigm of treatment and re-examine methods for the engineering of stents. The design of a stent, including its geometry, is an important predictor of restenosis. Stent implantation is known to cause changes in vascular geo metry resulting in altered blood flow through the stented region that has been shown to correlate with the development of restenosis. Stent implantation also causes vascular damage, and recent data indicates that adversely altering blood flow can lead to r estenosis after this vascular injury. The objective of this project is to develop a novel stent geometry that diminishes restenosis and the potential for thrombus formation by intrinsically minimizing blood flow disturbances after implantation. Optimizing local flow patterns created by the stent may inherently reduce blood flow alterations associated with restenosis and thrombus formation while avoiding the use of deleterious agents that are required for current drug-eluting designs. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE : Restenosis after traditional bare-metal stent implantation limits the success of stents and has cost the U.S. healthcare system an estimated 2.5 billion dollars since 1999. Drug-eluting stents designed to combat restenosis are prone to late thrombosis th at increases the likelihood of myocardial infarction. These problems with traditional bare-metal and drug-eluting stents can be explained on the basis of altered blood flow within the stented region, and this project will create a stent that minimizes flow disturbances to intrinsically reduce restenosis and the potential for thrombus formation and dislodgement.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.