SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Geometry-Based Parallel, Adaptive Finite Element Analysis Framework

Award identifier 6ad3681a65a5ee93041466ec187532b46052bc11993a6e3b3a6dec77eaf34d3bAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$740,265

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1998

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SIMMETRIX, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
PLYJMZNJWCN3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

72 A Geometry-Based Parallel, Adaptive Finite Element Analysis Framework--Simmetrix, Inc., 1223 Peoples Avenue, , Troy, NY 12180-3511; (518) 276-8045 Mr. Mark W. Bealll, Principal Investigator Mr. Mark W. Bealll, Business Official DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-97ER82476 Amount: $72,769 Two technologies are needed for the reliable simulation of physically and geometrically complex engineering and scientific problems. Parallel computing is needed to effectively deal with the large problem sizes, while adaptive methods are required to ensure the reliability of the calculation. Current efforts to join these two technologies suffer because there are disparate views of the computational processes which make their integration difficult. This project will combine a suite of geometry-based procedures with a new geometry-based, object-oriented, adaptive analysis framework to produce a product that can perform parallel adaptive finite element analysis in a real world environment. The Phase I project will develop the procedures needed for the analysis framework to work in a parallel computing environment. An investigation of the efficiency of the parallel adaptive analysis framework in a variety of parallel environments will be carried out. Emphasis will be placed on the application of the procedures on cost effective workstation networks. The Phase II project will concentrate on extending the Phase I system to address more complex non-linear problems and on improving the performance and robustness of the code to make it a viable commercial product. This will include building one or more full scale demonstration analysis products using the framework to help attract Phase III funding. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: The framework developed in this project would be used to build parallel, adaptive finite element analysis codes that run efficiently on machines ranging from single workstations, to clusters of workstations, to massively parallel supercomputers. The immediate benefit would be that these codes would be commercially available to allow users to design engineered products that are more efficient and less expensive. The object-oriented design of the framework allows new analysis capabilities to be quickly implemented and brought to market to help satisfy the ever growing need for simulation._

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

51 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2025). Reported award amounts total $19,416,923. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.