SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: Team Development Toolbox

Award identifier 140e11ef666a24b802a32db554ca67df6c5847ff22c8a9eef86c3d890b1cfc41Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Team Craft
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project focuses on filling a gap in distance/distributed learning courseware: facilitating collaborative learning. Web-based learning tools, in particular Learning Management Systems (LMS), have yet to effectively marshal the benefits of team collaboration, namely, deeper levels of knowledge creation. While this finding is continually reinforced in research, new tools to develop these relationships have not been forthcoming. A new type of tool is needed, and the Team Development Toolbox (TDT) will be this new type of resource. Team Craft, Inc. is collaborating with The University of Texas to develop the TDT as a commercially viable suite of web-based software tools that are integrated into a LMS to support team formation and relationship building among students participating in asynchronous distance learning in science and similar courses in higher education. The TDT will be accessible through a school's web-based learning platform using a standard web browser and Internet connection. Among the deliverables in Phase I, the project will produce detailed product specifications, a rapid application prototype and related software evaluation model, and a white paper describing key factors contributing to successful distance learning and how the Team Development Toolbox will aim to promote this success. Effective teamwork is one of the most valuable resources for developing successful learners. Teamwork is most effective when team members are aware of, have access to, and commit to using effective processes. These processes promote good decisions and timely action. Specifically, the Toolbox proffered will foster positive relationships to support effective team process. Toolbox will contain a combination of new tools and extant tools, some having existed previously as a paper resource, others as isolated software. These tools have not heretofore been integrated into one resource and promoted on major on-line learning platforms. The Team Development Toolbox will enable students, otherwise isolated by distance, to initiate collaboration with supportive processes that instruct and draw-out best practices. It will help thus make the advantages of team learning accessible to students who do not have an ability to meet in face-to face interactions, including students with disabilities. The facilitation of learning experience that are truly shared among a community of learners will mean that learning from a distance can take its place as comparable in a positive way to many traditional classroom formats. The development team will disseminate non-proprietary research resulting from this grant through the resources of the Learning Technology Center at the University of Texas at Austin.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.