SBIR/STTR Research Award

A New Method For Discrimination of Tachycardia Sites

Award identifier 44aaae98d4d856169438f88a362a0d9941f3a463c8f574d99d476ca97d4658a2Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,865

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2004

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
NORTHWEST RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
CBP3W28RNZB3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The standard interpretation of electocardiographic data does not allow differentiation of certain types of rhythm disorders, necessitating invasive testing. We believe that there is additional information contained in the ECG, in the form of small but systematic phase and amplitude changes that may provide important localization information. We will use inversion theory and modern signal processing methods to address a set of clinically interesting problems involving early excitation and re-entrant events. In Phase 1 as proof of concept, we will study atrial tachycardias originating at the superior vena cava versus right pulmonary vein in order to provide information on the source of the abnormal rhythm. We make this choice for our initial study in part because of its clinical significance, in part due to the relative isolation of the P wave from other parts of the ECG, and in part due to the expected success in differentiating candidate paths. We will obtain digitally recorded 12- lead ECG data from subjects during ablation procedures. We anticipate that 1/2 of the data will be used as a training set and 1/2 reserved as a test set. Our principal Phase 1 goal is to develop prototype code to differentiate arrhythmia sources and to test the method on clinical data. The method will be considered successful if it shows a better success rate than conventional methods on the same data, or if it shows a comparable success rate with clinically significant improvement in resolution compared to conventional methods. The principal commercial application of this research is the production of a modular, commercial quality software algorithm suitable for inclusion in an ECG analysis system. The initial focus will be on atrial tachycardias originating at the superior vena cava versus the right upper pulmonary vein. If this is successful, we will expand our methods to include differentiation between candidate sites for a wide variety of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. We also note that if the method is successful, it may be possible to extend the results to more complicated arrhythmias and re-entrant events involving multiple entry points, or events obscured by other, larger phases.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

64 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1984–2024). Reported award amounts total $18,759,062. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.