SBIR/STTR Research Award

Material System Design Tool to Enable Functionally Graded Materials

Award identifier 1ffa27bff6cca646a8fb7a7b2be3e3e84df198759ba9b092ceb66b36371d43ebAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$140,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
APPLIED OPTIMIZATION, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-07-09
Contract end date
2026-01-20
UEI
JGPNAVA6MSJ9
Solicitation number
25.A
Topic code
N25A-T004

Research abstract

The Phase I research objective is to demonstrate feasibility of a material system design tool for multi-material Functionally Graded Materials (FGMs) to improve the mechanical performance and environmental protection of structural and subsystem components. The FGM designs will be created using an ICME-based tool that combines thermodynamic modeling with AM process modeling for the Directed Energy Deposition (DED) process. The FGMs will include material combinations with poor thermodynamic compatibility, which requires the use of buffer materials and the prediction of a material composition gradient pathway.  The composition gradient pathway will consist of transitions between the base material, one or more buffer layers, and the target material. Starting with the base and target materials, and choices for the buffer layers, the ICME-based system will include algorithms to avoid deleterious phases, mitigate cracking, and predict the effect of DED process parameters on critical parameters such as dilution profile and layer thickness, as follows: Thermodynamic modeling will be used to design the composition gradient pathway to: (i) avoid the formation of deleterious phases, (ii) tailor the thermal expansion coefficient, and (iii) minimize susceptibility for hot cracking. DED process modeling will be used to achieve the composition gradient, either continuous or discrete, by predicting DED processing parameters (e.g., scan path, powder feed rate, standoff distance, power, scan velocity, and hatch spacing) to manage dilution, thickness of the FGM transition zone, thermal stress, and the evolution of thermal history during DED as a function of the FGM sample geometry. The Phase I will demonstrate this methodology to design two FGM systems and buffer elements, namely between (i) Ti-6Al-4V and IN718, and (ii) 316L and Cu. The Phase I Option will demonstrate design of a third FGM system and buffer elements between 316L and Ti-6Al-4V. Each FGM design will be validated by producing FGM samples with buffer materials, and characterizing their microstructure and mechanical properties. Phase II will demonstrate the tool by designing five or more FGM systems that are useful to Navy applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

56 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2025). Reported award amounts total $23,196,315. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.