SBIR/STTR Research Award

Drug susceptibility assay for non-subtypr B HIV-1

Award identifier b2b8ac33e1fc1622820a3d9babe1b49ba263482dfd47953320f4dbac8e2d2849Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$598,919

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
MONOGRAM BIOSCIENCES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LFM3XDVK31M7
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Phenotypic and genotypic drug resistance assays are used routinely for management of treatment experienced, HIV-1 infected patients in North America and Western Europe. As anti-retroviral therapy becomes a reality in resource-poor countries, the need for resistance testing to monitor the emergence of drug resistance and to guide subsequent regimen selection will increase. In many of these countries, subtype B is not the predominant subtype of HIV-1 that is present. Current recombinant virus-based, commercially available phenotypic assays use a subtype B-based vector into which patient-derived protease (PR) and/or reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences are transferred. Preliminary results indicate the existence of subtype-specific differences in RC and susceptibility to certain drugs, but it is not known whether these are artifacts of inter-subtype incompatibility between patient insert and test vector, or reflect inherent differences in viral fitness or susceptibility among subtypes. The goal of the proposed research is to develop a phenotypic susceptibility assay for PR and RT inhibitors and RC using a subtype-specific reporter gene-containing vector that matches the subtype of the patient virus. To determine whether the mismatch between the patient virus and the testing vector influences assay results, we propose to construct a test vector from subtype C, and use this vector to generate a comparative data set from subtype B and C patient virus sequences inserted into matched or mismatched vectors. This subtype C-specific resistance assay ("PhenoSenseHIV-C") could then be used to support international trials of antiretroviral therapy in Africa and Asia, as well as in North America and Western Europe for patients infected with subtype C HIV-1. Future experiments will depend on the results of this phase I project, which is anticipated to last 2 years. If the data indicates that significantly different results are obtained for subtype C samples in the IGW-B backbone, construction of other subtype IGW (e.g. from subtype A) will be undertaken in phase II. However, if the results indicate that there are no influences of backbone-insert on resulting Phenotypic and Replication Capacity data, ViroLogic's currently commercialized PhenoSense HIV- assay will be further validated for use with subtype C viruses.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

14 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2009). Reported award amounts total $10,399,742. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.