SBIR/STTR Research Award

Virtual Reality Assisted Functional Rehabilitation System

Award identifier 036d56f4e08942fcd011deb77d1556279785f3a5da8eb3edfd8a141b422b0477Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
GREENLEAF MEDICAL PRODUCTS
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Virtual Reality-Based TeleRehabilitation System The technology used for physical rehabilitation has languished behind other sectors of medicine, and clinicians have not had effective tools to follow progress of therapy over the course of injury recovery. However, recent improvements in virtual reality and sensor technology now make it possible to develop an effective and inexpensive rehabilitation system that has the potential to dramatically improve rehabilitation outc omes for neurological and musculoskeletal injuries and disorders, while reducing overall rehabilitation costs. In Phase I of this project, Greenleaf Medical and Forterra Systems will evaluate the feasibility of incorporating one or more novel motion-sensor technologies into a Virtual Reality TeleRehabilitation (VRTR) System for treating victims of stroke, traumatic brain injury, and musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities. Sensor technologies to be evaluated include 3-axis MEMS rate gyros, 3-axis MEMS accelerometers, 3-axis magnetoresisitve sensors - individually and in combination with each other - and the Nintendo Wii Remote. Signals from these motion sensors attached near the joints of the upper extremity will be used to drive the images of ava tars in patient-relevant virtual environments, as the patients performed the prescribed therapeutic exercises. Performance of the various sensor technologies will be assessed by accurate 6-DOF magnetic tracking units, and by comparison to fixed landmarks. Derivation of body-centric position/orientation signals will be based on Euler's Angles and quaternions. Patient-relevant scenarios will be developed on the Forterra- developed On-Line Interactive Virtual Environment (OLIVE) Platform. In Phase II we propos e to prototype the VRTR System, and to implement procedures for securely and interactively linking patient-movement data captured by this rehabilitation system to the patient's clinician, creating a fully functional telerehabilitation system. The VRTR Syst em will be designed to: Encourage patient compliance with exercise regimens by linking exercise protocols to interactive flat- panel VR scenarios that provide motivation and real-time feedback. Provide timely information to the clinician regarding patien t progress and patient compliance with prescribed treatment regimes. Optimize rehabilitation results by accumulating confidential and secure data in an outcomes database incorporating daily patient rehabilitation progress matched to rehabilitation protoco l information. The database can be used to generate evidence-based protocols specific to injuries and patient profiles.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.