SBIR/STTR Research Award

Dispersion Engineered Passive Matching Loads to Extend the Bandwidth of Electrically Small Antennas

Award identifier 6fabd66d5c8cecaa9670809d18f1e1cdf33a24518576ac53b25010f6c9d18977Awarding agency Department of Defense · Office of the Secretary of Defense

Award amount

$847,371

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Recipient company
SILICON AUDIO RF CIRCULATOR LLC
Proposal award date
2025-07-08
Contract end date
2027-07-14
UEI
GUCGKBLWLLD7
Solicitation number
23.B
Topic code
O23B-001

Research abstract

The need for antennas that are at the same time broadband and electrically small has always been one of the open challenges in the area of antenna design and engineering, and it has recently become of tantalizing importance, given the growth of wireless communications and the demand for sophisticated electronic devices typically packing tens of antennas with different functionalities and frequencies of operation. Here we propose a research program to conceive, design and realize dispersion engineered matching loads capable of extending the bandwidth-efficiency product of electrically small antennas well beyond the Chu’s lower bound for a single-resonant passive, linear, time-invariant antenna. In this program, we have been building on recent breakthroughs in antenna design, leveraging the fact that proper dispersion engineering of the matching load, and of its loss, can enhance the bandwidth of electrically small inductive or capacitive antennas beyond what is possible using conventional approaches in a simple and compact platform without the need for active power-hungry elements or nonlinearities. In Phase I of this project, we have set the basis to successfully implement such broadband electrically small antennas, by demonstrating with simulations and initial proof-of-concept measurements that it is possible to optimize dispersive lossy matching networks to significantly broaden the bandwidth of a single-resonant passive antenna, even to the point of going beyond Chu’s limit. The goal of Phase II will be to translate these initial successes into practical devices, and demonstrating that it is possible to realize passive, dispersion engineered matching networks for electrically small antennas that significantly reduce the Q-energy of the antenna, and hence broaden its bandwidth both in terms of impedance matching and radiation features, without distorting the signal or the radiation pattern. We will focus on configurations of interest for commercial and defense applications, aiming at demonstrating operations beyond the Chu’s lower bound within practically viable and commercially appealing antenna setups.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2025). Reported award amounts total $2,389,720. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.