SBIR/STTR Research Award

Polarized Xenon Production: Multi-liter Accumulation

Award identifier dbe2ea02346dc746d6d759ce4a2271d8c40a5e159e48c90714126a1cac889898Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$749,977

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
XEMED LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YJ8MJGAAWGM7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Hyperpolarized gases, both xenon-129 and helium-3, have demonstrated utility in structural and functional lung imaging and quantifying lung disease. In contrast to helium-3, however, xenon is cheap and abundant. Its lower diffusion constant offers scientific advantages over helium, offsetting the disadvantage of its lower gyromagnetic ratio. Availability of a polarizer producing six liters per hour (a liter every ten minutes) at 50% polarization, almost a factor of one-hundred over most existing polarizers, would trigger widespread investigations and applications of hyperpolarized xenon as an imaging agent. The UNH group demonstrated a new type of xenon polarizer that flows the gas mixture at relatively high velocity and low pressure along a direction opposite to the laser beam. This polarizer demonstrated polarization of over 60% for small quantities and 20% for a production rate of over four liters per hour. The figure-of-merit (polarization times production rate) of this polarizer presently exceeds all other polarizer technologies by an order of magnitude. We propose to increase the output by another factor of six to ten. The cryogenic technology routinely used to accumulate hyperpolarized xenon recovers only 60% to 80% of the produced polarization for a fraction of a liter and far less for larger accumulations. Our new technique proposed for Phase I STTR successfully demonstrated 100% recovery for one-half liter and 88% recovery for one liter. We fabricated a prototype freeze-out cell, implemented an automated moving cryostat, and tested the device on our existing polarizer. Furthermore, we solved the critical materials question to produce a scalable implementation. Simple extensions of this implementation offer accumulation and full recovery of virtually unlimited quantities of hyperpolarized xenon. In Phase II we propose to increase the capacity of the accumulator, improve the control hardware and software, and simplify and automate the thawing procedure. We also comprehensively address the remaining limitations to scaling up the entire polarizer: polarizer column glassware design, gas flow parameters, and vacuum capacity. Increasing laser output and reducing the physical size of the polarizer are separately funded STTRs. These combined developments will scale up our laboratory prototype and convert it to a practical commercially-available hospital-based device.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

31 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2020). Reported award amounts total $18,233,125. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.