SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Novel Method for Manufacturing Low Cost, Large Screen, Wall-Hanging Plasma Display Panels Using a Novel Three Dimensional Camera

Award identifier 2ba615b1ce32806154ecac634ef1a7317d34ef383fbaae5b31bc604749d9f210Awarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$59,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1997

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
TECHNEST, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
L6V2A46RFEE9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Large-screen (over 35" diagonal length) wall-hanging displays have many applications in BMDO, such as flight simulation, command control center display, mission rehearsal and training, virtual reality environment development. They are also highly demanded in consumer electronics industries, such as high definition TV (HDTV), and electronic instrumentation. However, the current costs of most large screen flat penal displays are prohibitively high for most military and civilian consumers, and thus their use is limited. The primary objective of the Phase I SBIR effort proposed herein is to investigate the feasibility of a novel and extremely simple addressing method, which we called the "Beam Matrix Scanning" method (BM), to produce low-cost, large-screen DC Plasma Display Panel (DCPDP) systems. The innovation is based on the use of two or more electronic beam guns, instead of solid-state switchers, to address and scan a plasma display panel. The proposed method is able simplify the panel structure by eliminating all built-in resistors from each display cell. Therefore, this innovation can drastically reduce the complexity of the scanning circuitry associated with the PDP, which leads to complexity reduction of display panel design and manufacture. With the formidable challenge faced by the traditional high cost PDP structure and scanning methods, we estimate the cost of larae screen FPD can be reduced bv three to five folds by adopting this revolutionary method. In this Phase 1 SBIR effort, we will carry out theoretical analysis, engineering design and feasibility validation of such a display system. We will build and test a prototype system to validate the cost reduction concept. In the Phase 2, we will develop technique to manufacture large screen displays with required resolution, brightness, and color. Due to the high market demand on large screen displays, and our unique low cost manufacturing method, the success of our Phase 1 and Phase 2 will virtually guarantee the investment and commercialization effort from private sectors. If succeed, the low cost design and manufacturing method developed in this SBIR will have a significant impact on the large-size flat panel display industry. Beyon

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

93 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2010). Reported award amounts total $25,161,289. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.