SBIR/STTR Research Award

Synthetic Gasoline from Biomass

Award identifier b36b24e6758f770154677cd98227d9ff209094b64e807104a5bd38a6d95320daAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ELTRON RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, INCORPORATED
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
HJ7KXNJ9CV48
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Clean and renewable liquid fuels from biomass offer reduced new emission of CO2 and less dependence on expensive and unreliable foreign oil. Currently, bioethanol serves in the U.S.A. as bled for gasoline but eventually it could replace gasoline in passenger cars altogether. Ethanol, however, contains only 2/3 of the energy of gasoline on equal volume basis, and if used at high concentration, it requires retrofitting of existing cars. It could therefore be economically and technologically more attractive to convert biomass to a hydrocarbon-based synthetic gasoline (SG), i.e., a hydrocarbon mixture performing similarly to petroleum-derived gasoline. The proposed project will develop a new, novel biomass derived gasoline fuel. Specifically, we will convert methanol catalytically to C5-C10 isoalkanes. Methanol could be obtained from biomass, either directly by biochemical processes, or indirectly form synthesis gas (CO + H2) produced by biomass gasification. In the proposed catalytic conversion of methanol to SD, the hydrocarbon product is free of any naphthenes and aromatics, and of heteroatom and metal impurities. Co-produced isobutene could be reacted separately to provide isooctane and/or isononsne, or ETBE as additional fuel liquid with very high octane. The overall SG product may be superior to conventional gasoline in having higher ignition and combustion efficiencies, less toxicity and less emission of pollutants such and CO and THC. At methanol cost of ~35 ¢ per gallon, this SG could be produced at about half the price of current gasoline. Phase I aims at (1) showing feasibility and substantiating preliminary results, and (2) preparing simulated SG samples of relevant isoalkane compositions and analyzing them for their gasoline specs, to compare them with conventional gasoline. In Phase II of this project, we shall construct and operate a bench scale methanol conversion apparatus to afford a full technical feasibility study with an eye toward commencing a pilot plant engineering design effort, possibly through partnership with a biomass processing business and/or an oil refining company. Post Phase II, a demonstration scale facility will be constructed to produce fuels for large scale engine testing.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

318 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2013). Reported award amounts total $59,197,041. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.