SBIR/STTR Research Award

DOPED PSN.91-PT.09 ELECTROSTRICTIVE SINGLE CRYSTALS

Award identifier 441459f65f33b7e9d2ba42f10df842d5659d3d63c42aa69a7f2c44c9a54f25d7Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$69,961

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1997

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
FOSTER-MILLER, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
XDF1FRDG8KK4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Requirements for high quality electrostrictive single crystals continue to be important because the polycrystalline PSN-PT materials have a lower coupling coefficient . Single crystal PSN-PT is an attractive transducer material because of its very high energy density and its capacity to undergo large electrostrictive strains. Foster-Miller has conceived of an innovative approach to grow PSN.91- PT.09 single crystal compositions, uniformly doped, large diameter PSN-PT single crystals either by itself or encapsulated in a porous single crystal sapphire skeleton. Our processing approach eliminates the following problems - small crystal size, high defect structure and cracking, high >42% PT compositions associated with limitations of the current state of the art crystal growth processes. Additionally, our "sapphire/PSN-PT composite" will have a high fracture toughness, thermal shock resistance, and light weight without much reduction in the PSN-PT electrostrictive properties. Foster-Miller's process has the capability of growing single crystals at relatively low temperatures not possible with current crystal growth processes. Also, being a isothermal constant temperature process, it will promote uniform distribution of dopants and constant PT concentration levels. Our approach will be an enabling technology for producing low cost, high efficiency, high strength electrostrictive single crystals that are stable at high temperatures. The process is versatile and has the potential to produce high quality piezoelectric and electrostrictive single crystal materials of other desired compositions. The Phase I program will involve the growth of PSN-PT single crystal specimens and characterization including X-ray diffraction, dielectric and piezoelectric measurements. The Phase I team includes Penn State University as a subcontractor who will evaluate these materials. Foster-Miller's process has the capability of growing single crystals at relatively low temperatures not possible with current crystal growth processes. Also, being a isothermal constant temperature process, it will promote uniform distribution of dopan The Phase I program will involve the growth of PSN-PT single crystal specimens and characterization including X-ray diffraction, dielectric and piezoelectric measurements. The Phase I team includes Penn State University as a subcontractor who will evaluat

Technology keywords

Not reported

Research funding history

924 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2006). Reported award amounts total $172,256,128. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.