SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Recombinant Anticoagulant Proteins

Award identifier beb182e2ed7ec6e978b460ee4e9f9ea4e611b3cc62947e55653ba0d67671090fAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$152,652

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
EVAS THERAPEUTICS LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
N7UMM55RJ7S5
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Phase I: Clot formation in the blood vessel (thrombosis) causes a broad range of serious clinical conditions, such as unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and peripheral vascular disease. It is a leading cause of death and disability in the developed countries. Anticoagulant drugs are needed for the short-term treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders and for the long-term prevention of recurrences. Currently available anticoagulant drugs have various limitations. More efficacious, safer, and easier to use anticoagulants are demanded. The long-term objective of this application is to develop highly effective new anticoagulant drugs to meet the above therapeutic needs. Using genetic engineering technology, EVAS Therapeutics has created a series of recombinant proteins that bind anionic phospholipids with high affinity and potently inhibit membrane-associated coagulation enzyme complexes. As a result, these anticoagulant proteins are site-targeted to thrombus, exceptionally potent, and may achieve superior antithrombotic efficacy with lower risk of systemic bleeding side effects. The main objective of this phase I proposal is to demonstrate the ability of these hybrid proteins to specifically localized on the thrombogenic cells in vitro and to achieve antithrombotic effect in vivo. In addition, small-scale E. coli fermentation and protein production processes will be carried out to supply materials for the in vitro and in vivo studies. The specific aims of this phase I project are to: 1. Establish the binding specificity of the fusion proteins to normal vs. perturbed cells in vitro. Differential binding of the fusion proteins to stimulated vs. resting platelets and endothelial cells will be studied in order to demonstrate the specific binding of the fusion proteins to thrombogenic cells. 2. Demonstrate the antithrombotic efficacies of the fusion proteins and complete the dose response study in a mouse arterial thrombosis model in vivo. A mouse arterial thrombosis model will be used to establish the antithrombotic efficacies of EVAS' anticoagulant molecules. 3. Develop a bioprocess to produce the recombinant fusion proteins for in vitro and in vivo studies. A more efficient fermentation and purification process will be established to provide the needed materials for Phase I research. This process will also lay a foundation for Phase II GLP production of the recombinant proteins.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.