SBIR/STTR Research Award

Engineered scaffolds for complex craniomaxillofacial reconstructions

Award identifier 19bf953e54d497e443cd41a477f0691ddfdf56fc1fe9f3617911b68c2cb0b9b0Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$849,728

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
TISSUE REGENERATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PA10-050
Topic code
NIDCR

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Large mandibular segmental defects resulting from tumor resection, trauma, and congenital anomalies remain one of the most difficult clinical challenges in CMF reconstruction. Autologous tissue grafts and synthetic materials are the current clinical gold standard but suffer from significant drawbacks that make these solutions far from ideal. In particular, prosthetic devices implanted to fill mandibular bone defects and attached to the adjacent host tissues with titaniumplates or screws are prone to failure due to metal fatigue and fracture or bone resorption at the host tissue-metal interface. To compete in the CMF reconstruction market, a degradable biomaterial platform able to act as a carrier for osteobiologics mustbe established. Tissue Regeneration Systems, Inc (TRS) has developed a platform technology to design and fabricate bioactive resorbable coated devices for CMF reconstruction. TRS also completed a SBIR phase I to demonstate the fidelity and reproducibilityof its platform. With this proposal, we will move modular osteoconductive scaffold platforms in two aims: 1) determine the best osteoconductive coating conditions in vitro for cell and protein attachment, and 2) test our CMF scaffolds in a clinical settingto reconstruct large mandibular defects in a large animal model, the Yorkshire pig. Successful completion of this proposal will represent a significant advance in TE reconstruction of mandibular defects, using an innovative modular osteoconductive scaffold. Furthermore, testing in a large pre-clinical animal model will give TRS the data necessary to support a 510K submission for FDA device approval. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Mandibular reconstruction following tumor resection, trauma, and congenitaldefects remains one of the most difficult challenges in craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgery. Successful reconstruction must simultaneously fill complex defects, sustain chewing forces, and achieve a complete repair of compromised bone tissue. To address these issues, we propose to engineer modular osteoconductive scaffolds for use with intra Operating Room (intraOR) biologics to reconstruct large segmental mandibular defects in a pre-clinical porcine animal model. These bioresorbable scaffolds will address current limitations in mandibular reconstruction associated with the use of metal plates including dehiscence, fatigue fracture, hardware loosening and difficulties in achieving complete aesthetic and functional reconstruction.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.