SBIR/STTR Research Award

CREATION OF A NASA SPECIFICATION TO EXECUTABLE PROGRAMS (NASA/STEP) CAPABILITY

Award identifier 3f68da271c8fb7f7fa764fcb479dd11bbe671da1b2d17baa44eb267d57c48a01Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$494,885

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1992

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
International Software
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

SUPPORT FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROCESS IS A WIDELY RECOGNIZED PROBLEM. THE GOAL OF THIS PROJECT IS TO DELIVER A NASA DOMAIN-SPECIFIC SPECIFICATION-TO-EXECUTABLE-PROGRAMS (NASA/STEP) CAPABILITY BASED ON THE EVOLVING STRATEGIC DEFENSE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (SDDS). THE SDDS CAPABILITY CURRENTLY EXISTS IN PROTOTYPE FORM BUT IS STRONGLY ORIENTED TO THE STRATEGIC DEFENSE SOFTWARE DOMAIN. IT AUTOMATICALLY TRANSLATES GRAPHICAL MODELS (SPECIFICATIONS) INTO THIRD-GENERATION COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES FOR TEST AND VERIFICATION. THE GRAPHICAL MODELS CAN BE DECOMPOSED, ANALYZED, AND EVOLVED ASKNOWLEDGE OF SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN EVOLVE. INSTRUMENTATION OF THE MODELS CAN PERMIT TEST AND VERIFICATION OF THE SOFTWARE DURING EACH ITERATION. THE MODELS MAY BE DISPLAYED, TESTED, OR STORED IN THEIR VARIOUS LEVELS, THUS INCREASING HUMAN UNDERSTANDING, MANAGEMENT CONTROL, REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN SPECIFICATION, AS WELL AS REUSABILITY OF THE SOFTWARE. THE PHASE I OBJECTIVES ARE TO IDENTIFY THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF NASAREGARDING USE OF THE STEP TECHNOLOGY TO DEVELOP LARGE-SCALE,COMPLEX SOFTWARE SYSTEMS. THE PHASE II EFFORT WOULD BE TO DELIVER A PROTOTYPE NASA/STEP. THE EXPECTED BENEFIT TO NASA IS AN ACQUIRED TECHNOLOGY AND THE CAPABILITY TO MORE EFFICIENTLY SUPPORT THE SPACE SOFTWARE-SYSTEMS LIFE CYCLE. SUPPORT FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROCESS IS A WIDELY RECOGNIZED PROBLEM. THE GOAL OF THIS PROJECT IS TO DELIVER A NASA DOMAIN-SPECIFIC SPECIFICATION-TO-EXECUTABLE-PROGRAMS (NASA/STEP) CAPABILITY BASED ON THE EVOLVING STRATEGIC DEFENSE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (SDDS). THE SDDS CAPABILITY CURRENTLY EXISTS IN PROTOTYPE FORM BUT IS STRONGLY ORIENTED TO THE STRATEGIC DEFENSE SOFTWARE DOMAIN. IT AUTOMATICALLY TRANSLATES GRAPHICAL MODELS (SPECIFICATIONS) INTO THIRD-GENERATION COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES FOR TEST AND VERIFICATION. THE GRAPHICAL MODELS CAN BE DECOMPOSED, ANALYZED, AND EVOLVED ASKNOWLEDGE OF SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN EVOLVE. INSTRUMENTATION OF THE MODELS CAN PERMIT TEST AND VERIFICATION OF THE SOFTWARE DURING EACH ITERATION. THE MODELS MAY BE DISPLAYED, TESTED, OR STORED IN THEIR VARIOUS LEVELS, THUS INCREASING HUMAN UNDERSTANDING, MANAGEMENT CONTROL, REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN SPECIFICATION, AS WELL AS REUSABILITY OF THE SOFTWARE. THE PHASE I OBJECTIVES ARE TO IDENTIFY THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF NASAREGARDING USE OF THE STEP TECHNOLOGY TO DEVELOP LARGE-SCALE,COMPLEX SOFTWARE SYSTEMS. THE PHASE II EFFORT WOULD BE TO DELIVER A PROTOTYPE NASA/STEP. THE EXPECTED BENEFIT TO NASA IS AN ACQUIRED TECHNOLOGY AND THE CAPABILITY TO MORE EFFICIENTLY SUPPORT THE SPACE SOFTWARE-SYSTEMS LIFE CYCLE.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.