SBIR/STTR Research Award

Eradication of Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

Award identifier d115c96771cb4c94fd1c76571d55ec49a8bcac6cc8fbda4536d3de8c44266eecAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$417,731

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
DOSEBUSTERS USA, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Noise-induced hearing loss remains one of the most common industrial diseases in U.S. The monetary cost of occupational hearing loss is staggering; for example, the cost to the military for compensation for hearing loss as a primary disability only is currently over $630 million per year. The non-monetary costs, in terms of social and physical disability and general quality of life, cannot be easily quantified. This proposal describes an innovative methodology that has the potential to eradicate noise-induced hearing loss from the workplace. The doseBusters USA approach to hearing loss prevention involves the continuous monitoring of personal protected noise exposure; this metric has previously been unavailable to the hearing conservationist, and it is the only quantity that is directly related to the potential of noise-induced hearing loss. Phase 1 of this project involved integrating communication capabilities into the doseBusters hardware. Phase 2 of the project expands on that concept by integrating a talk-through circuit into the dosimeter, and also strives to enhance user-acceptance with the novel integration of the hardware into a 'smart' safety cap. The safety-cap mounted personal exposure measurement system is an elegant solution to two distinct requirements: protected exposure monitoring and enhanced communication at the workplace. Since each worker downloads his noise exposure data on a daily basis, a large amount of data is generated across a typical industrial facility. Phase 2 will also include the development of a web- based database management system that will allow the system to be seamlessly integrated into the workplace without a burden on management. Finally, a six-month field trial of the new safety cap-mounted communication-capable hardware will be performed at an aluminum smelter. All field study personal exposure data will be managed by the web- based system developed in Phase 2. Despite the best efforts of US industry, workers continue to lose their hearing; the current state-of-the-art in occupational hearing conservation is based on a failed paradigm that includes monitoring and recording data that has no correlation with the potential for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). The doseBusters USA methodology involves quantifying the risk for NIHL on a daily basis by measuring actual protected noise exposure. The evolution of this technology, including the addition of communication capabilities, the development of an integrated 'smart' safety cap, and the development of an elegant data management system, will enhance user- and management-acceptance.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.