SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I:Development of Oxidation Resistant Coating System for C/C Composite by Solution Approach

Award identifier 27b58353fe7c7a08c2ac83b55355784e4f75f168a1fba8f2cf5a477b357e5083Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$99,967

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
UES INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FV5WK6YTN215
Solicitation number
NSF 07-551
Topic code
AM

Research abstract

This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) phase I research aims to develop a dual-layer protective coating system for carbon/carbon (C/C) composites, using a novel, low-cost sol-gel method. The success of the dual-layer coating technology has been proven earlier by the company?s the physical vapor deposition (PVD) process, which is, however, quite expensive. The proposed research aims to use a low-coast process to achieve the same quality and performance goals with an overall low-cost manufacturing process. The C/C composites are used in the construction of pressure pads for aircraft braking systems exposed to extremes of temperatures and other harsh environments (e.g. airport runways and aircraft de-icing chemicals and use of temperature-indicating crayons during maintenance checks performed during refueling). This exposure to chemicals accelerates oxidation of the carbon composites and premature failure of brakes. The currently used oxidation protection technology is not adequate for the achievement of lifetime of the brakes as specified by the design. Thus, this technology, with its novel, low-cost coating process, has a significant benefit for improving the service life of critical brake pads. The broader impacts of this technology, if successfully developed and implemented on a commercial scale, will significantly improve the performance of a critical aircraft component. Other potential civilian markets for this technology will be in the auto race car engines which also experience very harsh operating environments during racing events. Additionally, this technology could open up new applications for the use of C/C composites in brake pads in the long-haul transportation rigs running on America?s highways. Thus, successful development an implementation of this technology will have significant impact on the U.S civilian and military vehicles, by improving the reliability and durability of the critical braking systems, which will save lives, improve fuel efficiency and performance of our critical transportation infrastructure.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

294 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2023). Reported award amounts total $73,979,003. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Contractor profile

UES, INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.