SBIR/STTR Research Award

Glutamate Biosensors for Ischemia In Vivo and Tissue Studies

Award identifier 2d45962d5ac7a5fa646b3c4178d89dc0dae6916a321f65ad983f79976d18c1a2Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$788,763

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Pinnacle Technology, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
V6SXZL55NMZ9
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The overall goal of this Phase II project is to develop, test, and commercialize glutamate biosensors that can be used to measure cytotoxic concentrations of glutamate under low oxygen conditions (pO2< 40 torr). Specific aims of this proposal include: complete development and testing of 180 urn-diameter glutamate biosensors for low oxygen environments and 76 um-diameter for normal oxygen environments and manufacture for sale; develop and test a 76 um-diameter, low pO2 glutamate biosensor; develop a software-configurable, 2-channel, head-mounted, wireless potentiostat that can perform the simultaneous measurement of oxygen and glutamate under ischemic conditions, in freely moving rats; introduce automation at key points in the manufacturing process and investigate electrodeposition techniques to increase sensor manufacturing yield and facilitate the development of smaller sensors. To reach these objectives Pinnacle Technology and the University of Kansas are building on past successes in the design of glutamate biosensors and wireless potentiostats for rats. These products were developed in separate collaborations and are currently being commercialized. Products to be introduced as a result of this Phase II proposal include a 76 urn glutamate biosensor and 180 urn glutamate biosensor for use under ischemic conditions, a 76 um glutamate sensor for use under normal pO2 conditions, and the wireless potentiostat system. Commercial applications include stroke research, disease research and drug discovery. Technological innovations include biosensor, and biosensor membrane design, turnkey head mount design, and advanced electronics design. Each year about 700,000 people in the United States have a stroke, over 80 percent of which are ischemic. An excess of glutamate is believed to be responsible for much of the damage done to brain cells during cerebral ischemia events (stroke), but the interdependent physiological processes surrounding glutamate release/transport/uptake during ischemia are poorly understood. In order to study these events, a new system needed to be developed which would measure glutamate under the ischemic, low oxygen conditions

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

37 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2025). Reported award amounts total $17,494,860. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.