SBIR/STTR Research Award

Prognostic Bearing Assessment Testbed for High-Load Non-Steady State Systems

Award identifier 832f9581e12dc750eaf364892b9e82ef6d9b6696475570ab0318c491d9953390Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$139,997

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
LUNA LABS USA LLC
Proposal award date
2025-06-23
Contract end date
2025-12-29
UEI
M6JVSYRQRYM9
Solicitation number
25.1
Topic code
N251-006

Research abstract

Maintaining reliable and maintainable high-load bearings is critical to the operational availability of U.S. Navy aircraft carrier arresting systems. Bearing failures in these systems can arise from a combination of mechanical and environmental factors such as lubricant degradation, fatigue, extreme temperature fluctuations, and high dynamic loads during operations. Maintenance and operational costs are significantly impacted by frequent greasing and teardown inspections. The implementation of condition-based maintenance (CBM) through sensorization could provide real-time health assessments of bearings, reducing the frequency of shutdowns and increasing overall operational efficiency. Existing approaches lack the capability to precisely simulate the complex failure modes observed in Navy aircraft carrier arresting system bearings, making it difficult to validate CBM methodologies. To address this gap, a dedicated test rig is necessary to replicate real-world failure mechanisms, enabling the systematic study of degradation patterns, wear progression, and sensor response under varying operational conditions. Construction of a test rig will provide reliable data for estimating maintenance intervals and detecting fault signatures in arresting gear systems utilizing ML techniques. During Phase I, Luna Labs and VTNSI will develop a conceptual design for a sensorized high-load non-steady-state testbed to produce data to train and test ML models, which will form the basis of CBM nodes. This testbed will serve as a critical platform for the future development of CBM fault detection models. Construction and validation of the operational of the testbed for data collection will be performed during Phase I Option and Phase II periods, utilizing the conceptional design developed in the Phase I base. Luna Labs and VTNSI will leverage open-source datasets, simulations, and previously collected data from analogous testbeds to inform the design process. This iterative and data-driven approach will ensure the testbed is robust to provide high-quality fault data in environments relevant to on-asset sheave bearings and effectively support the development of advanced CBM solutions in subsequent phases.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

116 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2025). Reported award amounts total $67,780,099. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.