SBIR/STTR Research Award

Refractory Composites for Reactor Applications (PSI-7266-290)

Award identifier b38449631b52799655909b3ffc983451dabc95dae51c84e056178f3b0e1511c3Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$749,960

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
RMG1AZ1ZH8Q7
Solicitation number
DE-FG01-05ER05-28
Topic code
26

Research abstract

Next generation nuclear reactor cores will operate at temperatures near 1000ºC to increase fuel utilization efficiency. However, the Martensitic steels, which are traditionally used in reactor construction, and the Alloy 800H, planned for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant demonstrator, do not possess the mechanical strength or oxidation resistance to reliably and safely function in systems that operate at these temperatures. Carbon-carbon and silicon carbide ceramic composite structural materials, now under consideration for in-core structural applications, have high strength at high temperature, but do not perform well under off-normal high temperature (emergency) oxidation conditions. In this project, fiber-reinforced ceramic composites will be modified with refractory metals to substantially increase their oxidation resistance and retain high temperature strength. Phase I demonstrated carbon-fiber-reinforced refractory-enhanced silicon carbide composites that retained strength of more than 140 MPa after rapid oxidation at 1000ºC. The helium erosion resistance of the composites was comparable to state-of-the-art SiC/SiC materials, and the composites retained thermal conductivities in excess of 10 W/m-K. In Phase II, post oxidation strength will be increased to more than 140 MPa, and thermal conductivity will be maintained at 10 W/m-K, after helium aging at 1000°C for up to 3000 hours. The composite fabrication process will be scaled up to demonstrate that successful compositions can be fabricated with properties that vary by no more than 10%. Prototype control rod guides and sheaths, fabricated from the best compositions, will be the deliverable. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: High temperature, oxidation resistant refractory composites should enable the full-scale commercialization of Next Generation Nuclear Plants. Additional commercial applications include ducting for high temperature exhaust systems, including catalytic converters and incinerators; high temperature catalytic converters for diesel engine systems, which would reduce particulate emissions and help maintain clean air standards; and high temperature exhaust ducting in incinerators, which would allow more complete combustion of waste products and minimize toxic emissions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Research funding history

1,763 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2026). Reported award amounts total $698,949,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.