SBIR/STTR Research Award

Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Sanfilippo A Lysosomal Rare Disease

Award identifier 782b00a4d8480d00cb3014ae0523d4c6f56b17df358f6ece28113417da844997Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$202,586

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
XL Sci Tech Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
H1Z8MEH658H9
Solicitation number
PA12-088
Topic code
NCI

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Current practice in the USA for inoperable esophageal cancer is a palliative treatment using metal stent for end-stage cancer patients. Outside the USA (especially in Far East countries including China and Korea), therehave been reported clinical benefits of attaching sealed sources such as prostate seeds to the outside of an esophageal stent. Although simple and preliminary, such radioisotope sources had doubled the mean survival period with high statistical confidence. The investigators have analyzed the current state-of-the-art and have formed a critical cluster of interdisciplinary experts for the development of advanced radioactive esophageal stents that will maximize dose to the tumors and significantly shorten thedose delivery time to more quickly achieve maximized clinical benefits. The Phase I research focuses on the therapeutic energy of radioisotopes and the integration of radioisotope sources with popular stents. The ultimate goal is to improve treatment efficacy by matching radiation dose distribution to tumor distribution. The specific aims include (1) identifying the best radioisotope sources for integration with the best esophageal stents; (2) preserving the device classification as 510K for faster FDA approval. The Phase II research will begin with in vivo biocompatibility assessment and end with preliminary clinical assessment using the proposed advanced radioactive esophageal stents. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: The successful introduction of radioactive esophageal stent has the potential to dramatically improve the efficacy of esophageal cancer treatment, especially for earlier stage inoperable esophageal cancers. The use of proper radiation sources is expected to improve the safety and efficacy of radioactive esophageal stent. This project is to establish the feasibility of new radioactive esophageal stent with personalized dosimetry, to fill the void in the USA for radioactive esophageal stents, and to increase the USA's competitiveness in esophageal cancer treatment. With early detection and accurate dosimetry, it is possible to elevate the palliative esophageal treatment to a possible cure for inoperable esophageal cancers.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

17 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2021). Reported award amounts total $7,991,308. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.