SBIR/STTR Research Award

Cryopreservation of Human Epidermal Skin Models

Award identifier f751e7d6148d5cf567fda55289dc6eedac6abbcbd1974df5c303988dfb08482dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$160,330

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Cell & Tissue Systems, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2010-2
Topic code
NCRR

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): In an effort to reduce the use of animals for toxicity testing, companies have developed in vitro skin models or equivalents to replace the Draize skin irritation test. This development has been further pushed by a European Union regulation that will prohibit the use of animals for collecting toxicological data on cosmetic ingredients beginning in 2009. Recently, the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) has validated two skin models to replace the Draize test. Supply of these engineered tissues skin equivalents is a significant issue that can be solved by development of effective cryopreservation methods. Presently, these constructs are made to order and require a lead time of several weeks before they can be used. A cryopreserved product would be available when needed eliminating lead time required to manufacture the product. Additionally, performance of quality control checks for stock that is ready to be shipped could be performed and large batches could be manufactured providing a cost savings to suppliers. A cryopreserved skin model would also provide the end-user greater flexibility for scheduling of experiments without concern regarding availability of the constructs and it would be possible to order from the same batch of product in order to have better control of uniformity within research studies. This proposal is to determine the feasibility of cryopreserving these skin equivalents. The proposed studies will begin by establishing conditions for cryopreservation of keratinocytes in tissue culture plates and well inserts. The optimum preservation conditions would then be used for cryopreservation of a commercially available epidermal skin model containing keratinocytes established on well inserts. It is anticipated that major innovation will be required due to the complexity of both the tissue and delivery system consisting of membrane inserts in multiwell plates. In Phase II studies, these conditions will be applied to other epidermal models that are commercially available and to more complex models which contain more than one cell type. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Human epidermal skin models have been developed by several companies and two have been validated for use as in vitro replacements for the in vivo skin irritation test. A preservation method for these skin models will insure that these constructs are readily available when needed, providing a less expensive, consistent, quality controlled product. Success in this project will help reduce the number of animals employed for research and increase availability of human test models that may be more predictive of toxicity and irritation in humans than current live animal models.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.