SBIR/STTR Research Award

MEMS BASED CONTINUOUS ALCOHOL MONITORING DEVICE

Award identifier e7cebf60c4abfdc04f951a380b7cc94dd412bbb057198a037c4f3d6416028fd8Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$399,851

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2002

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
PHOENIX BIOSYSTEM, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NXDUD4NDDQ93
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This two year Phase I project will combine the electrochemical biosensor technology with the unique silicon microneedle based ex-vivo monitoring technology, to produce low cost MEMS (MicroElectroMechanicalSystems) for continuous monitoring of blood alcohol levels. We propose to create mini-erosion of the skin with the silicon microneedles to obtain free flowing interstitial fluid (ISF). The alcohol level in the ISF will then be analyzed ex-vivo with the silicon based biosensor. The analyte in this work will be ethyl alcohol, but the technology is also applicable to many other analytes including continuous monitoring of glucose by diabetics. Diabetic glucose self-testing is currently the largest existing biosensor market opportunity. In the first year, electrochemical biosensors will be integrated into silicon microneedles to fabricate disposables for in vitro measurement. Issues related to continuous flow of fluids through the device will be evaluated using buffer solutions with serum proteins. The work of the second year will focus on extending the operating lifetime of these devices toward disposables for monitoring ethyl alcohol concentration continuously. Animal studies will be conducted to evaluate the strength of the microneedle for penetrating the stratum corneum as well as to establish feasibility of continuously monitoring ISF alcohol. Once the system is validated in animal models, human subject testing will be conducted under the supervision of Dr. Robert Swift at Brown University. A silicon biosensor microchip packaged with a telemetry chip to make a small button-like device which can be attached to the skin unobtrusively to measure alcohol concentration continuously and transmit this data will be the goal of a SBIR Phase II project. The strength of our approach lies in the ex-vivo monitoring of body fluid with a biosensor and thus avoid the problems associated with subcutaneously implanted in-vivo biosensors. The major challenges of subcutaneously implanted in-vivo biosensors are loss of sensitivity, fouling of the sensor over time and in-vivo calibration. We believe that by attempting to make the measurement outside the body with an integrated biosensor silicon microneedle could lead to the development of commercially viable continuous monitoring device.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

27 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2022). Reported award amounts total $7,473,973. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.