SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Device for Quantifying Spasticity

Award identifier 49ca258f719edf310d851722146d787a0c537e26ea15e6426103e3c0918ea4b7Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,513

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
C8FUKQKC9JB4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Development and demonstration of a non-invasive and clinically practical device for quantifying resistance to passive motion in patients with muscle spasticity is proposed herein. Spasticity is a disabling consequence of disease or injury to the central nervous system and/or muscle, such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, tumor, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, or multiple sclerosis. Spasticity can lead to severe restrictions in physical activity and participation in society, motor incoordination, muscle tightness and bony deformities, and spasm- related pain. The proposed device will provide a reliable, valid, fast, and relatively inexpensive means to quantify and analyze spasticity in subjects' limbs, provide measurement/analysis results to healthcare practitioners, and store measurements for future use, such as for evaluation of therapy and treatment effectiveness. This device will emulate aspects of the Ashworth Scale for spasticity, which grades resistance felt by an examiner during passive movement using an ordinal scale. However, new device will provide important new information by: (1) quantifying the absolute magnitude of spasticity (rather than a mere ordinal ranking); (2) calculating the rate of change in resistance; (3) evaluating the velocity-dependency of the response; and (4) differentiating spasticity from stiffness and voluntary/other involuntary muscle activation through use of electromyogram (EMG) recordings. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS: Diagnostic precision, and ultimately treatment prescription and outcomes, will be enhanced by the proposed device, which will have considerable economic impact in healthcare. This device addresses deficiencies in treatment protocols currently based on clinical impressions rather than definitive evidence of the presence and degree of spasticity. This device will facilitate optimal treatment choices and outcomes for the millions of patients who have motor disabilities characterized by spasticity.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

331 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2025). Reported award amounts total $130,507,041. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce, Department of Education, Department of Energy

Contractor profile

BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.