SBIR/STTR Research Award

Fretting Fatigue Model

Award identifier 5e8195bd70144df4f98cfdbe09e23f8490be1e14893bb2554ea1c1c5650432a6Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$63,450

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
APES INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
L6U3LJ28QRD9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The multi-task objectives of the plan discussed in this proposal are: research the role and effects of fretting on structural life of components, develop and demonstrate the feasibility of integrating candidate fretting fatigue predictive analytic model(s)into structural integrity methods, integrate and implement the techniques for applications to present and future U.S. military weapons programs, commercial aviation, automotive, and mechanical equipment and provide industry access to the predictive toolsand information for commercialization. Fretting, as defined by the American Society for Metals Handbook Volume 10: Failure Analysis and Prevention, is a wear phenomenon that occurs between two mating surfaces: it is adhesive in nature, and vibration is itsessential causative factor. Usually fretting is accompanied by corrosion. In general, fretting occurs between two tight fitting surfaces that are subjected to a cyclic, relative motion of extremely small amplitude. Fretted regions are highly sensitive tofatigue cracking. Under fretting conditions fatigue cracks are nucleated at very low stresses. Nucleation of fatigue cracks in fretted regions depends mainly on the state of stress on the surface and particularly on the stresses superimposed on the cyclicstress. The time to nucleation of cracks can be significantly reduced as a result of fretting. Common sites for fretting are in joints that are bolted, keyed, pinned, press fitted, and riveted. These sites are common in the assembly of most air vehicles,ground vehicles, power plants, equipment, and machinery. All applications that have safety issues, maintenance issues, and service life requirements will benefit from quantitative methods that provide the impact of fretting on the component's service. Theapproach APES, Inc. proposes for this SBIR improves the Holistic Life Prediction Methodology (HLPM) and the corresponding software ECLIPSE that implements the HLPM by adding a fretting fatigue capability that will be validated and verified withexperimental and field service data (if available). Phase II's product will be a robust analytical approach that adequately accounts for fretting fatigue mechanisms and influences on predicted structural lives, having tremendous potential for improvingdurability and damage tolerance (DADT) in many industries. The aircraft industry, both commercial and defense, will be the first industry recipient of the applications afforded by this program. Systems in the aircraft industry that will be affordedbenefits by improved analytical fretting fatigue approaches include transports, fighters, helicopter, commercial, small aircraft, and their subsystems, including engines.A robust analytical approach will have many benefits to other industries besides the aircraft industry. Improvements in analytical methods in the automotive, heavy machinery and medical device industries will be possible. For instance, fretting and wear inautomotive engines and other components with moving parts such as differentials and transmissions are difficult problems that can become quite costly over the life of an automobile. Also, it is well known that wear and fretting in heavy machinery costbusinesses millions each year in maintenance downtime, repair bills, and capital costs for replacement machinery; improvements in analytical predictive methods will contribute to improved maintenance, inspection and intended usage procedures for this typeof equipment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2022). Reported award amounts total $3,550,250. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.