SBIR/STTR Research Award

Deep-UV Microscopy for Real-Time Adequacy Analysis of Bone Marrow Aspirates

Award identifier 751cd9ce6e4780332955abe081cf6b965575b5e92fc662c7027b8919f01ba854Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,074,143

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Cellia Science, Inc.
Proposal award date
2025-06-11
Contract end date
2027-04-30
UEI
M4PEEHE4DJJ3
Solicitation number
PA23-230
Topic code
NIBIB

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT Cellia will improve the quality and reliability of bone marrow aspiration procedures by developing a point-of-care instrument for rapid, non-destructive sample adequacy assessment. Our approach is based on a recently developed label-free, deep-ultraviolet (UV) technique for cell imaging and analysis. Spicules, which indicate sample adequacy, are easily identifiable in unstained, pseudocolorized UV images due to the spicules’ strong light attenuation at 255 nm. The resulting deep-UV images can be generated in a fraction of a second and whole slide imaging can be done in a few minutes, making the technique suitable for real-time use during aspiration procedures. The deep-UV images are also nearly identical to the clinical standard Giemsa-stained slides, which take over 45 min to process. Label-free, deep-UV imaging can be combined with machine learning (ML) techniques for feature extraction and classification for automated quality assessment of aspirate smears in real time without a pathology technician. Phase I work, using data from N=51 patients, met or exceeded all milestones. This study demonstrated spicule adequacy assessment via visual assessment by a bedside pathology technician (current state of the art at tertiary hospitals) achieved 87.2% sensitivity (SE) and 67% specificity (SP), while automated assessment using deep-UV microscopy had improved SE (100%) and SP (80%). The specific aims of this Phase II proposal are to: (1) Transition instrument control to a printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) and optimize optical, electrical, and mechanical hardware; (2) Develop production-ready software components including a user interface and ML training and inference; and (3) Integrate instrument hardware and software and evaluate effectiveness of automated adequacy assessment on clinical samples. Completion of these aims will result in a commercial-grade device with demonstrated safety and effectiveness. Upon completion of this project, a limited battery of additional tests, primarily focused on reproducibility and process validation, will fulfill the remaining testing requirements for to receive FDA clearance.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2025). Reported award amounts total $2,080,145. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.