SBIR/STTR Research Award

Controlled Processing for High-Performance Fine Filament Bi-2223 Conductors

Award identifier e409430f488289633a129dd98f5571d50a7985dbbaa5a37ed2166d0007ef73ceAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1998

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
CA6KHVAFESK4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

169 Controlled Processing for High-Performance Fine Filament Bi-2223 Conductors--American Superconductor Corporation, Two Technology Drive, Westborough, MA 01581-1727; (508) 836-4200 Dr. Gilbert N. Riley, Jr., Principal Investigator Mr. Ramesh Ratan, Business Official DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-97ER82321 Amount: $75,000 High-temperature superconducting wire technology is a basic building block that can provide a comprehensive solution to the problems of improving the efficiency of delivering electric power. In order to commercially acceptable, however, this wire has to be low cost and high performance. The development of novel processes for fabrication of fine filaments of bismuth-2223 conductors offers the promise of substantial performance improvements and cost reductions. In this Phase I project, two novel and heretofore unexplored thermal processing concepts will be investigated that pertain to the thermodynamic aspects unique to fine filament bismuth-2223 composites. A novel controlled manufacturing process will also be developed through which long and continuous lengths of high-performance high-temperature superconductors can be fabricated. Successful work in Phase I will enable substantially greater control over the microstructural development in bismuth-2223 composites, particularly in terms of achieving a higher level of phase purity and further simulating the beneficial effects of reaction- induced texturing. As a result, specific critical parameters, such as current density and product yield, will be improved, ultimately resulting in a new class of high-performance bismuth-2223 composites. The Phase II project would focus on developing the production-scale thermal process and equipment and equipment so that a quality manufacturing technology can result. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: If successful, this project will substantially improve the price to performance ratio of bismuth-2223 conductor, and in conjunction with other work, will achieve a production cost of no more than $10 per kiloampere per meter, a cost making silver or bismuth-2223 attractive for many power system and high energy physics applications. _

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

88 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1989–2023). Reported award amounts total $22,941,409. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.