SBIR/STTR Research Award

Complex Coolant Fluid for PEM Cell Systems

Award identifier 366f1e9d1f3ef0e18338bf7018f4be8c522ebb1ab6ea4095cf6bbdac31d31a16Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$749,947

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
DYNALENE INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FBKLBGH1PNB1
Solicitation number
DOE/SC-0072
Topic code
32 c

Research abstract

75554B Fuel cells are an efficient, combustion-less, virtually pollution-free source of power. In particular, Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells are ideal for a number of applications, due to their ¿quick¿ warm-up characteristics. However, these fuel cells contain some inherent inefficiencies, which results in waste heat that must be removed rapidly via a coolant ¿ currently, either Deionized (DI) water or glycol/water solutions with a DI canister. Although these coolants are non-flammable and thermally efficient, their electrical conductivity increases rapidly unless the DI canister is replaced frequently, which significantly increases capital and maintenance costs. This problem will be addressed by developing a novel Complex Coolant Fluid (CCF), comprised of a base composition and an additive package. The base composition addresses the non-flammability, thermal efficiency, freeze point, and materials compatibility issues, whereas the additive package maintains a low electrical conductivity in the CCF. In Phase I, key ingredients of the proposed additive package were prepared and incorporated into the coolant fluid. The resultant complex coolant fluid formulations were tested in two dynamic loops, and the additives were shown to maintain the electrical conductivity of the coolant below 2.0 microSiemens/cm for more than 325 hours. In Phase II, the additive package will be optimized and a more detailed study of the coolant performance and longevity will be carried out in a dynamic test loop that simulates fuel cell conditions. Optimized coolant samples will tested and validated in actual fuel cells under various operating conditions. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: The new complex coolant fluid should significantly expand the versatility of the PEM fuel cells in both mobile and stationary applications by offering the advantages of freeze protection, corrosion inhibition, and low electrical conductivity in a single aqueous-based fluid, attributes that are not available in competitive alternates. The commercial applications include, but are not limited to, automotive fuel cell engines, power generation for residential and commercial buildings, back-up power for hospitals and other emergency establishments, fuel cells used in ships and space vehicles, and mobile machinery and equipment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2018). Reported award amounts total $2,739,126. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.