SBIR/STTR Research Award

Anaerobically stored red blood cells with extended shelf-life.

Award identifier b266c648c38a0600b9be1bc53ee8ed5187f74b4c3d7e6b2782d9fb7398cd52b1Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$133,290

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
NEW HEALTH SCIENCES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
CC3QRDB7EYX7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The long-term objective of this project is to develop a novel blood storage bag that will extend the shelf life of additive system red cell units, and at the same time, deliver red cells of higher efficacy for transfusion therapy. In this system, red cells are stored in a modified additive solution under oxygen- depleted conditions. The final product will have extended shelf-life (12 weeks or more) as well as higher efficacy compared to same-aged blood stored by conventional methods (more viable cells, higher oxygen delivery capacity immediately after transfusion and more deformable cells for better capillary perfusion). The new storage system will be readily accommodated by the current blood banking operation without incurring major alteration in procedures or equipments. In this Phase I proposal, a novel anaerobic storage system will be tested for its ability to extend shelf life by 50%(to 9 weeks) and to yield red cells with higher post-transfusion recovery compared to the conventional method (AS-1 additive system) after 6 weeks of storage. In a cross over clinical trial (8 volunteers), a unit of red cells will be collected and stored under anaerobic condition in an experimental additive solution (test) or in a conventional method (control). A small fraction of stored cells will be labeled and transfused back to the donor to assess the quality of the stored cells by measuring the 24 hr post- transfusion recovery and long-term survival. These measurements will be taken after 6 weeks of storage to assess whether the proposed system has higher recovery compared to the control. They will be also measured after 9 weeks for the test units to assess its ability to extend shelf life by 50%. Stored red cells with higher post-transfusion viability and oxygen delivery capacity will improve the efficacy of transfusion therapy and reduce associated side effects. Moreover, transfusion of such red cells will reduce the frequency- and time-averaged blood transfusion volume and total iron burden in subjects who require chronic transfusion (e.g., sickle cell disease or beta-thalassemia). Extended shelf-life will improve the logistics of general blood banking, alleviate the periodic blood shortages and enhance the utility of pre-operative autologous blood collection.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2025). Reported award amounts total $9,465,439. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.