SBIR/STTR Research Award

KNOWLEDGE-BASED TOOLS FOR THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS

Award identifier 954e164d82e8145146366e83b1b39e4b97897db9da9fe15f864418f755fb5fb5Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$47,550

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1991

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
PVTUFN472MM8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

WHILE CURRENT TECHNOLOGY HAS MADE THE AUTOMATION OF MANY CREW FUNCTIONS FEASIBLE, HUMAN CAPABILITIES, LIMITATIONS, AND PREFERENCES MAY MAKE AUTOMATING CERTAIN FUNCTIONS UNDESIRABLE. DESIGNERS INITIALLY MAKE FUNCTION-ALLOCATION DECISIONS DURING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS. THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO KNOWLEDGE-BASED TOOLS AVAILABLE THAT SUPPORT THE DESIGNER IN MAKING THESE DECISIONS. THESE DECISIONS DEFINE THE NATURE OF THE HUMAN'S ROLE IN THE SYSTEM AND DETERMINE THE POTENTIAL PERFORMANCE LEVELS THAT CAN BE ACHIEVED WITH THE SYSTEM. A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF THE LIFE-CYCLE COSTS OF A SYSTEM ARE ALSO DETERMINED BY DECISIONS MADE DURING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN. THE DESIGN TOOLS TO BE DEVELOPED IN THIS PROJECT WILL SUPPORT THE DESIGNER IN DEFINING AND ALLOCATING THE SYSTEM'SFUNCTIONS; EVALUATING THE HUMAN'S FUNCTIONS AND TASKS BY EXAMINING THE HUMAN CAPABILITIES, LIMITATIONS, AND PREFERENCES; AND SUGGESTING METHODS FOR OVERCOMING THE LIMITATIONS AND ENHANCING THE CAPABILITIES OF THE HUMAN. THIS EFFORT WILL DETERMINE THE NATURE OF THE SUPPORT THAT THE DESIGNER NEEDS, IDENTIFY DESIGN AND KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE TOOLS, AND DEVELOP A SCRIPTED PROTOTYPE TO DEMONSTRATE AND EVALUATE THE TOOLS. WHILE CURRENT TECHNOLOGY HAS MADE THE AUTOMATION OF MANY CREW FUNCTIONS FEASIBLE, HUMAN CAPABILITIES, LIMITATIONS, AND PREFERENCES MAY MAKE AUTOMATING CERTAIN FUNCTIONS UNDESIRABLE. DESIGNERS INITIALLY MAKE FUNCTION-ALLOCATION DECISIONS DURING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS. THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO KNOWLEDGE-BASED TOOLS AVAILABLE THAT SUPPORT THE DESIGNER IN MAKING THESE DECISIONS. THESE DECISIONS DEFINE THE NATURE OF THE HUMAN'S ROLE IN THE SYSTEM AND DETERMINE THE POTENTIAL PERFORMANCE LEVELS THAT CAN BE ACHIEVED WITH THE SYSTEM. A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF THE LIFE-CYCLE COSTS OF A SYSTEM ARE ALSO DETERMINED BY DECISIONS MADE DURING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN. THE DESIGN TOOLS TO BE DEVELOPED IN THIS PROJECT WILL SUPPORT THE DESIGNER IN DEFINING AND ALLOCATING THE SYSTEM'SFUNCTIONS; EVALUATING THE HUMAN'S FUNCTIONS AND TASKS BY EXAMINING THE HUMAN CAPABILITIES, LIMITATIONS, AND PREFERENCES; AND SUGGESTING METHODS FOR OVERCOMING THE LIMITATIONS AND ENHANCING THE CAPABILITIES OF THE HUMAN. THIS EFFORT WILL DETERMINE THE NATURE OF THE SUPPORT THAT THE DESIGNER NEEDS, IDENTIFY DESIGN AND KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE TOOLS, AND DEVELOP A SCRIPTED PROTOTYPE TO DEMONSTRATE AND EVALUATE THE TOOLS.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

18 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2003). Reported award amounts total $3,894,702. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.