SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Capacity High Speed Optical Data Storage System Based on Diffraction-Free Nanobeam

Award identifier 0550899bda33f3a0e4def0f4cc1dbc5c9c18068b3007dca5aebcae2558361a26Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$74,995

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1998

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Physical Optics Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DG3AB4E8R4D8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

50566-98-I High Capacity High Speed Optical Data Storage System Based on Diffraction-Free Nanobeam--Physical Optics Corporation, 20600 Gramercy Place, Suite 103, Torrance, CA 90501-1821; (310) 320-3088 Dr. Tin M. Aye, Principal Investigator Mr. Gordon Drew, Business Official DOE Grant No. DE-FG03-98ER82640 Amount: $74,995 DOE¿s nuclear physics laboratories, such as the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, produce a continuous stream of data, at the rate of 20 Mbytes/sec or more, which needs to be stored- a total data volume of 100 Terabytes per year. However, current data storage systems are limited in terms of both storage capacity and access time. To address this need, this project will develop an ultrahigh capacity optical data storage system based on diffraction-free nanobeam writing. The system will be built around a current well-engineered high speed optical disk system with an innovative diffraction-free micro optical element to produce a beam ~50 nm wide with ~cm depth of focus, allowing the system to address data at much higher speed, and to store it 100 to 1000 times more densely. Phase I will evaluate feasibility by system design and analysis, the demonstration fabrication of the key components, and with a proof-of-principle experiment. Specifically, a 50 nm large depth of focus (~1cm) nanobeam will be demonstrated by fabricating a special microdiffractive optical element and recording a high density data stream on a standard optical recording disk coated with a photopolymer material. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: The high capacity, high speed, optical disk memory system should find extensive commercial applications in large scale data storage, computer, optical communication, image archiving, library, medical, university, and research facilities. _

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

1,933 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2021). Reported award amounts total $549,686,800. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

PHYSICAL OPTICS CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.