SBIR/STTR Research Award

Embedded Sensors in Turbine Systems by Direct Write Thermal Spray Technology

Award identifier d0ed6e99a3b8fdd689b19be28934060da4ecba84cbf2b3f96de4266c3ddb3d20Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$0

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MESOSCRIBE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
W1BVWTLV53E1
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

70364B02-II Monitoring the performance of high temperature components in advanced gas turbine engines will be required in order to accelerate the insertion of advanced materials, coatings, and novel designs. For example, by continuously collecting component temperature and strain information, one can provide feedback on the efficiency and performance of the engine as well as the health of engineering components. Embedded sensors could achieve this requirement; however, the incorporation of sensors within harsh turbine environments represents a challenging task. In this project, embedded sensors will be incorporated within thermal and environmental barrier coatings through a newly developed conformal direct write thermal spraying process for thick film sensors, providing an innovative means to integrate robust, reproducible, thermocouples and strain sensors onto engine components. Phase I demonstrated that E and K-type thermocouples could be fabricated and incorporated within yttria stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings. The sensors measured temperatures up to 1200oC within the coating and survived prolonged exposure in a furnace and burner rig environment. Phase II will identify key components in turbine engines that are suitable for using this technology for condition monitoring. The sensor design, location, layout, lead wire extraction and signal collection issues will be iteratively optimized. The sensors will be fabricated and tested in bare and embedded mode with varying thicknesses of the protective coatings. Sensor performance will be assessed with respect to design criteria, survivability and behavior of the integrated component/coating. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by awardee: The in situ condition monitoring of gas turbine engines should be of major benefit to the energy sector since it enables performance optimization, failure assessment, and the condition-based maintenance of components (particularly coatings). The technology not only should be applicable to the gas turbine industry, but also could be easily extended to other harsh environment situations such as in fossil fuel power plants, diesel engines, and marine and space propulsion systems. Other applications include automotive, aeronautical, marine, and diesel engines.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

47 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2015). Reported award amounts total $15,634,284. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.