SBIR/STTR Research Award

New algorithm and multi step process for achieving better global project rankings

Award identifier 1f3c5ba848be7ffea562e4a9ccfee652536d583bc8c89e5579d32879d6e45622Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$225,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
PEVALS LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Q9SMDSL5J1B1
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
NIDA

Research abstract

Under this Small Business Innovation Research SBIR Phase I project Research Topic the contractor will investigate the effectiveness of new peer review methods Concordance Index based Global Ranking CIGR and Modified Borda Count MCB to enhance professional evaluation and decision making in life sciences management and administration The intended result is a novel set of metrics that can be used by NGOs disease foundations advocacy groups research funders policy makers and by academic institutional bodies This SBIR phase I project has the following objectives Simulation studies to investigate the effectiveness of the method used in the NSF pilot study and the contractor s new method CIGR The contractor will perform simulation studies to investigate the effectiveness of the new review method in terms of how it can recover the true ranking of proposals or papers The contractor will also study which parameter settings are optimal for the new review method Testing the new approach in real evaluation settingsThe contractor has implemented the method used in the NSF s pilot study as an online platform at http pevals com The contractor will implement our new ranking method CIGR in the phase I project and test the new peer review approach in graduate student course project essay evaluation at Florida State University In these tests the true rankings and scores of the project reports or essays will be obtained from the course instructor and used as the true rankings After collecting the ranking from individuals we will use both CIGR and the modified Borda Count MBC score proposed originally for the new peer review method and also used in the NSF s pilot study to obtain the final rankings and compare the accuracy of the two different ranking methods based on their agreement with the true rankings This test is unique in the sense that it has the true rankings obtained from the course instructors which will help us to evaluate the effectiveness of different ranking algorithms This test of using graduate student course projects will establish solid basis for our future tests on scientific papers and proposals The contractor will also test our method for a conference paper evaluation for a workshop in IEEE BIBM conference

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.