SBIR/STTR Research Award

Miniature MagLev VAD for Children & Adults

Award identifier fc0f6a45877ba8704bf707712c6d38b922d39037d5f6be9ab19ce2ad854809b9Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,095,580

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
LEVITRONIX, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Our goal is to create an affordable ventricular assist device, capable of meeting the needs of a broad range of patients with severe heart failure. The focus of this project will be to develop a miniature, low-cost, ventricular assist device, suitable for use for univentricular or biventricular support, for use as a bridge to recovery, transplant or a longer term implantable device. The specific design will feature a novel magnetically levitated configuration, whose key features allow rapid acceleration and deceleration in response to prescribed motor input power cycles. The major advantages of the current design are its small and relatively simple design, its ability to efficiently regulate pump output over a large range of flow conditions, and its ease of production. This program's overall goal will be to develop and optimize the design and construction of the magnetically levitated, centrifugal pump, and ascertain its physiological performance in vitro and in vivo. During Phase I of this project, in collaboration with the Texas Heart Institute, we demonstrated the soundness of this technology for both the adult and pediatric applications through a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments. In Phase II we intend to complete the design and validation of the product, and to launch device readiness testing in anticipation of clinical trials. The specific aims of this Phase II proposal are to: 1) Design and optimize the critical functional attributes of the pump system to meet cardiac support requirements. 2) Develop improved cannulae for ventricular assist device insertion. 3) Refine the design of the controller to operate over a broad range of pediatric and adult operating conditions, and to incorporate system alarms for fail-safe operation. 4) Conduct reliability testing of the controllers, motors and pumps to establish system confidence levels. 5) Demonstrate hemodynamic performance and biocompatibility for the proposed long-term VAD in an animal model. We believe that our technology, which provides effective ventricular assistance with a small, disposable device, may provide needed benefits to the health of a broad range of patients, while not adding significantly to the cost of caring for these patients. Achieving the aims proposed in this Phase II program will validate the safety and suitability of this device for evaluation under an IDE clinical trial, which will be carried out in a Phase III program. We project that in Phase III of the project we will meet the regulatory requirements governing an IDE, fabricate verified and validated hardware, establish reliability, and conduct indicated clinical trials.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.