SBIR/STTR Research Award

Computer Adaptive Testing of Pediatric Self-care and Social Function

Award identifier 0d2e8ce89f8424c2dc29c6833f80a2eedc2d6bbaf08311d2251e5c052a121384Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
CreCare, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
MV1DLCKJT6T7
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The objective of this proposed project is to achieve a major transformation in the technology used to assess self-care and social disability in children and youth. Measurement and practical requirements to identify disability and evaluate individual progress across pediatric age-groups and care settings present a serious dilemma to current fixed-item instruments. To address these deficiencies, the principal aims of Phase I are to: (1) build a prototype computerized adaptive testing (CAT) system of self-care and social function (SC/SF-CAT) based on existing Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) normative and clinical databases; (2) compare the accuracy, responsiveness and response burden of the prototype SC/SF-CAT with the full-length PEDI (SC/SF-PEDI); and (3) evaluate scoring comparability, respondent burden and acceptance of parallel versions of the SC/SF-PEDI and SC/SF-CAT in a prospective field test in pediatric clinical settings. Initial results of a PEDI-Mobility CAT have been promising. The product in Phase I will be prototype CAT versions of the PEDI self-care and social function scales. In Phase II of the research project, we will examine item calibrations of all three scales of the PEDI (mobility, self-care, and social function), add new functional items to broaden the age range coverage, conduct field studies to re-calibrate items, and create algorithms for a fully operational PEDI-CAT system. A practical and feasible PEDI-CAT will facilitate decisions on disability status, service eligibility, program needs and progress related to rehabilitation interventions across a wide spectrum of function content. The end-use product of this STTR project will be a marketable computer adapted testing system for the assessment of disability in children and youth between the ages of 6 months and 18 years. Adapted from the PEDI, and expanded to a broader age group, this new disability assessment will fill a critical void for a practical system tailored for clinical decisions (program eligibility, identification of functional needs, and assessment of progress) for individual children. Many rehabilitation settings may also find this measure helpful in meeting accreditation and institutional requirements for standardizing outcome monitoring in groups of children.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2006–2019). Reported award amounts total $1,861,093. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.