SBIR/STTR Research Award

Petroleum Indicator by Electric Relaxation

Award identifier dd06b511dbecf906ba9a936bda52ab86ff2ff7e54d6a95b4d6046dcd5fc71badAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$749,988

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2004

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Physical Optics Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DG3AB4E8R4D8
Solicitation number
DOE/SC-0059
Topic code
32

Research abstract

72681-The U.S. Department of Energy is seeking advanced ¿smart drilling¿ technologies to improve the nation's competitiveness in petroleum drilling. In response to this need, this project will develop a petroleum indicator that uses an electric relaxation sensor to monitor the drilling process in real time, allowing the operator to avoid blowouts and increasing safety, drilling efficiency, and environmental protection. The oil drilling monitoring device, based on dielectric spectroscopy, will be capable of detecting drilling fluid composition and flow with 1 percent accuracy of the oil component in the drilling mud volume. All the active elements will be robust, capable of withstanding the harsh environment encountered in the drilling process. Phase I developed a proof-of-concept sensor and demonstrated the detection of five percent oil in drilling fluid volume. Sensitivity measurements were limited by the available equipment; however, analysis indicated that sensitivities of 1 percent or better could easily be achieved. In Phase II, a working prototype will be constructed that will be capable of detecting oil concentrations between 1 percent and 100 percent. Tests will be conducted to demonstrate that the system can withstand the harsh drilling downhole environment, and that it can detect and discriminate oil, mud, gases, and various levels of salinity and other relevant minerals. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by awardee: The proposed technology and its spin-off products should enhance ¿smart drilling¿ capabilities in petroleum drilling process control and monitoring. Other potential applications include chemical/biological process monitoring, waste management, biological engineering, explosive gas warning systems, environmental monitoring, homeland security, military (monitoring of underground facilities), and space (aeronautic) and ground (automotive) vehicle fluid sensors.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

1,933 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2021). Reported award amounts total $549,686,800. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

PHYSICAL OPTICS CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.