SBIR/STTR Research Award

Innovative Composite Cores Utilizing High Strength Carbon Foam

Award identifier 9a04201fca06bf3626634bd842c8123af6032d558aae71f7d1eb48f89291370cAwarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
TOUCHSTONE RESEARCH LABORATORY, LTD.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FBK3WT3XQVH8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Touchstone Research Laboratory and its partner, Alliant Aerospace Company (ATK), propose to investigate the utilization of lightweight carbon foam cores in composite load-bearing structures. CFOAMr has the potential to be a revolutionary material inaerospace structures, significantly reducing costs and improving mission capabilities. Aluminum Honeycomb is the targeted material for replacement. The study will address three focus areas: design, manufacturing, and life cycle costs. Current techniqueswill be analyzed to show a manufacturing payoff of carbon foam utilization, especially in bonding operations to proven facesheet materials. Carbon foams developed from bituminous coal at Touchstone Research Laboratory are the basis for this improvementeffort. The Phase I effort will produce a sample sandwich composite system for evaluation of fabrication feasibility, material property requirements, and manufacturing process cost benefits. Phase II work will examine the replacement of a rocket honeycombcomposite or satellite bus structural system. This effort will produce a prototype component through methods determined in Phase I. Manufacturing costs will be reduced as panel joining operations, bonding material selection and implementation areimproved. Integration into current systems would be imperceptible. After being demonstrated in rocket or satellite applications, the structures can be adapted to many other aerospace applications. The carbon foam composite panel research will result in a lower cost and higher performance structures than those that are currently available, such as aluminum honeycomb cored composite panels. Lower life cycle costs through the introduction of carbonfoam technology will be enabled through reduced operational and maintenance expenditures. The technology will lend itself to improved aerospace composite structures in line with Lean Manufacturing Principles.The proposal directly supports aerospace structures, such as satellite busses, solar panel arrays, rocket structural and control surfaces. The technology can easily be adapted to aircraft structures such as flaps, speedbrakes, spoilers, and stabilizers.The technology can also be used to support aircraft auxiliary systems including: aircraft structural bulkheads, insulation, inlet ducts, avionics bay doors, weapons housings, access doors, and APU inlets.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

104 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $38,514,559. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.