SBIR/STTR Research Award

INVERSE DYNAMICS USING INSTRUMENTED ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

Award identifier a3de655db0f319580e2a2e12305d93a9550c3552bc760bd7caaecca5dea7e389Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,982

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2002

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
C-MOTION, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
GJPLU1M2BUE5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): In 1990, there were over 1.69 million noninstitutionalized walker users in the United States (85% over the age of 65 years). A walker is used to provide support, reduce weight bearing on the lower limbs, and therefore to minimize the likelihood of falls. There were, however, over 118.000 accidents (>75% involving females) reported between 1987 and 1992 which involved walker use and which required emergency room treatment (mostly hip fractures and upper body trauma). Biomechanical movement analysis is a key tool for understanding walker-assisted gait, and for providing quantitative objective measures of performance leading, optimistically, to improvement in walker design and guidance in walker use. Biomechanical analyses that include the kinetics of gait (e.g. force, moments and mechanical energy transfers) may be the most important tools because they help to explain the kinematics, and may reveal the neuromuscular strategy underlying the movement. To date, commercial gait analysis software do not incorporate Assistive devices (like a walker) into the Inverse Dynamics calculations because, in part, instrumented walkers that provide a complete description of the constraint provided by the walker handle do not exist commercially. The instrumented walker manufactured by AMT uses a 6 degree of freedom load cell attached to the handle to record the constraint force provided by the handle (the reaction force at the hand-handle interface). In order to perform an inverse dynamics analysis it is necessary to have 9 variables to define the reaction force completely (e.g. Force Vector (Fx, Fy, Fz), Center of Pressure (CPx, CPy, CPz), and Free Moments (Tx, Ty,Tz)) In Phase I AMTI will add two sets of 8 strain gauges to a new central core on the walker handle to provide signals for two components of the couple applied to the handle. C-Motion will use the eight signals, plus the geometry of the handle, to define completely the constraint force at the hands. C-Motion will develop an algorithm, based on the 6 degree of freedom analysis in its Visual3D software, that uses the 9 signals, and motion capture data of the position and orientation of the walker handles and the subject's hands, to produce a complete inverse dynamics analysis of the upper arms during walker assisted gait.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

40 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1984–2016). Reported award amounts total $7,496,526. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.