SBIR/STTR Research Award

Ablative Material to Efficiently Repair and Restore the Operational Capabilities of MK 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS) Ablative Materials

Award identifier 9dae9cff2592ca2703aa7871e8cc090bafd46a67bd8c7f55b64d5de8dbc6edcdAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$1,399,723

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
TEXAS RESEARCH INSTITUTE , AUSTIN, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-05-28
Contract end date
2027-05-27
UEI
LM1NWMDNNQ18
Solicitation number
12.1
Topic code
N121-063

Research abstract

The U.S. Navy faces a critical need for an ablative material that can be used to efficiently repair and restore the operational capabilities of the legacy ablative materials used in MK 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS). The objective of the proposed effort is to develop and validate a quickly applied high temperature ablative material, along with the associated installation procedures, that will restore the ablative materials within the launcher to operational capability. One of the goals of the ablation restoration is to ensure launcher resilience in a restrained fire event. An ablative repair material would offer a life cycle extending solution, enabling swift repairs to damaged ablative components, extending the lifespan of the individual VLS cells, and rapidly restore and enhance the launcher’s readiness for missions. With this new capability, the Navy can ensure the sustained operational effectiveness of the Fleet, bolstering national defense capabilities and safeguarding maritime security. Texas Research Institute Austin Inc. (TRI Austin) proposes the development of an ablative material that can be sprayed or troweled onto the eroded ablative materials in a VLS cell to maintain the performance and extend the longevity of the ablative system in the launcher cell. Employing TRI Austin’s unique and innovative cutting-edge High Velocity Oxygen Fuel (HVOF) Ablation Testing Facility, TRI Austin will meticulously screen and assess these modified materials, ensuring only the most effective variants advance to rigorous full rocket motor ablation testing. TRI Austin will develop the procedures necessary to restore the performance and longevity of the original ablative materials in the launcher cell with the application of the repair materials. The adaptation of rapidly applied ablation material will result in achieving a goal of ablative material field repair that can be accomplished during rearming the MK 41 VLS. The proposed approach will revolutionize maintenance practices for these vital protective components of the VLS and will enable a greater number of missiles to be reliably fired from each cell of the MK 41 VLS.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

416 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $140,672,616. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, Department of Commerce, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.