SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Clinical Test of Olfaction Based Upon MEMS-Microvalves

Award identifier 92241939b9baa41b9611beafe14262fd87201a05fd862e8247460a1cd68a544fAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,924

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
OSMIC ENTERPRISES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DUQ7ZEJK8L26
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Phase I: The overall objective of this project is to develop an inexpensive test of olfactory function for use in the clinical assessment of the sense of smell. The test will be based upon an olfactometer employing state-of the-art technology, specifically, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), i.e., microvalves. (Microvalves are produced using techniques analogous to those used in manufacturing integrated circuits, resulting in a dense array of valves in a very small area.) The incorporation of MEMS microvalves into a clinical test of olfactory function is a unique approach in solving the complex problems associated with generating and controlling the large number of different odor stimuli required for such a test. This device will be able to administer, score, and record the results in response to commands received via the World Wide Web (WWW). The test, in reality, becomes a Web based application available world wide, once the MEMS-based olfactometer has been attached to a computer connected to the WWW. In this Phase I application, the use of microvalves as the basis for a clinical olfactometer will be investigated. Three Specific Aims are proposed: 1) to evaluate the feasibility of using MEMS microvalves as a means for generating odor stimuli in a clinical olfactometer; 2) to develop an odorant containment system compatible with the MEMS microvalves; and 3) to characterize and duplicate the odorant stimuli used in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), a widely used and well standardized test of olfactory function, in order to develop a comparable set of stimuli for the MEMS-based olfactometer. A clinical test of olfaction incorporating the MEMS olfactometer will be more economical than tests currently available, will permit self-administration, and will allow collection of all relevant information directly into a digital format (computer file). Successful development of this clinical test of olfactory function will permit routine examination of the sense of smell in the general population at a minimal cost. The ability to accomplish this is becoming even more important as the population grows older and olfactory function is diminished or lost, due to natural aging processes, or the onset of numerous neurodegenerative disease states such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2016). Reported award amounts total $3,493,525. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.