SBIR/STTR Research Award

The Feasibility of Creating a Bio-Based Slug Control Product from Quackgrass

Award identifier 15f111b0a8a61f39172c39339f0f4f098066ae56c9c63c8ed6ce1b54610bcf20Awarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$69,948

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
IPM Laboratories Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
JG1AKG6Q43D7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

In 1980, USDA weed scientist Roger D. Hagin identified quackgrass as a potent slug deterrent in no - till corn. Subsequently, he and coworkers identified the active ingredient as 6-hydroxy 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-B- carboline-3-carboxylic acid (6-HT C-3COOH), demonstrating very significant toxicity (LD50 of 5 ¿g per gram). The compound exhibits little or no mammalian toxicity and no effect on one species of worm and three species of worm and three species of freshwater snails. If we can show that quackgrass leaves carry enough toxicity to kill slugs, it will be possible to create a new specialty crop and a new slug control product. Two requirements for using quackgrass as a raw material for slug control are: 1) Slug mortality must be linked to the active ingredient concentration in quackgrass, 2) Active ingredient concentration must be high enough in quackgrass leaves to justify its use. In Phase I, we will analyze the concentration of active compound in harvests of different growth stages of quackgrass formulate baits with concentration of active ingredient that bracket the lethal dose observed by Hagin and Bobnick (1991). Subsequently, the two most promising bait formulations will be assessed for slug control in field trials. Additionally, the effect of moisture on the baits' effectiveness will be documented in laboratory bioassays.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2001). Reported award amounts total $304,025. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.