SBIR/STTR Research Award

Injectable collagen crosslink augmentation for degenerative disc disease

Award identifier 3c00a71994a0fc21234d575aea35980350b7d1a6df302f806089813428905f2bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$767,902

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ORTHOPEUTICS, LP
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2010-2
Topic code
NIAMS

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): With regard to prevalence and cost to society, low-back pain has few peers. With a patient population in excess of 15 million/year, the societal cost is estimated to be in the realm of 100 billion/year. Current treatment options for this disease have shown limited success, including physical therapy, medication and surgery. This proposal involves a novel, nonsurgical and cost-effective, tissue revitalization approach which shows promise for treatment of mechanically and nutritionally challenged tissues like the spinal disc. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Injectable collagen crosslink augmentation in stabilizing spinal joints, decreasing disc bulge under load, increasing the strength, tear resistance, and durability of the tissue, while also improving nutritional flow to these largely avascular tissues. Phase I testing was successful in characterizing the crosslinking effects of seven candidate agents in disc annulus fibrosis (AF) tissue using mechanical, thermal and protease digestion assays. At least one preferred agent was identified, and concentration, pH, conditioning, and buffering were optimized to maximize the efficiency of crosslinking and mechanical effect. Recently, in vitro assays have been undertaken to determine agent and buffer biocompatibility. The proposed Phase II testing will provide data necessary for regulatory filings and first-in-man clinical trials. Reagent delivery, penetration, reaction kinetics, permanency (effect duration), and storage requirements (shelf life) will be thoroughly investigated. Acute, functional biocompatibility and neurotoxicity studies will be conducted to quantify expected and worst-case treatment effects in an animal model. Further characterization of crosslinking effects will be determined using different subgroups of human AF tissues (variations in age, composition, degeneration). By bringing this path-breaking treatment to the doorstep of clinical trials, SBIR funding will play a vital role in enabling progress towards the ultimate goal of providing a novel, cost-effective treatment in the struggle against low back pain and disability. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Back pain and disability associated with spinal degeneration and instability remains among the most costly and prevalent health problems in the US today. With a patient population in excess of 15 million/year, the societal cost is estimated to be in the realm of 100 billion/year. Due to the limited success of current treatment options, it is reasonable to expect that an effective nonsurgical solution could revolutionize clinical care for this pandemic.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.