SBIR/STTR Research Award

Realtime Monitoring of Sublingual Blood Velocity

Award identifier b6a072b1d49723c9803f9bc4f40d133f412c5a8f1aa5fb5f2629a6949c17c868Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
CW OPTICS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The most common cause of death among hospitalized patients in noncoronary intensive care units is sepsis. Despite interventions, sepsis affects more than 800,000 Americans each year, incurs a mortality rate of 30% to 80%, and causes more than 250,000 deaths per year, at a cost of $16.7 billion. More Americans die in one year from severe sepsis than from breast cancer, lung cancer, and stroke combined. An investigation of the differences in morbidity and mortality between early and late onset of septic shock in ICU patients found that septic shock is more severe when of early onset, as reflected by more severe organ dysfunction, greater lactic acidosis, and higher vasopressor requirements, yet the outcome is better, as reflected by a shorter duration of the shock episode, shorter ICU stay, and slightly lower mortality rates. Early detection of sepsis would be more effective when the diagnostic modalities are combined with hemodynamic monitoring, central venous O2 saturation monitoring, and sublingual capnography. Most hemodynamic studies in sepsis and septic shock evaluate therapeutic strategies to increase cardiac output, blood pressure, and organ blood flow. Even though the skin and other microcirculatory areas have enjoyed rigorous research activities, so far, no monitoring techniques have yet been validated in terms of reproducibility. Recent studies showed altered sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in septic patients and a possible correlation between the severity of microcirculatory alterations and survival. The main objective of this research is to investigate the utility of a new imaging technique for realtime, noninvasive, and quantitative measurements of sublingual and/or mucosal blood velocity in humans for the purpose of providing information on sepsis. The innovation of this project lies in the application of the new technique to measure, quantitatively, sublingual blood velocity for monitoring sepsis. The ultimate product of this research will be a small, handheld device that provides real-time, noninvasive, and quantitative measurements of sublingual blood velocity for the purpose of monitoring sepsis in ICUs. This device would provide vital information to clinician on the state of the patient's microcirculation to allow the application of more timely interventions. The most common cause of death among hospitalized patients in noncoronary intensive care units is sepsis. The onset of sepsis changes the blood velocities of the tongue. This research is to investigate the utility of a new imaging technique for real-time measurements of blood velocity of the patient's tongue in the intensive care units.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.