SBIR/STTR Research Award

NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTION FOR CANCER CACHEXIA

Award identifier 08ec0c3fe6e3acb38e712dfa9be3109db0b3261717b90fc1c80dab481a218c27Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$386,951

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
MTI Biotech Incorporated
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
N5NDNJL8QGA1
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION: (Scanned from the applicants description) The American Cancer Society estimates 564,800 Americans will die of cancer this year. Evidence suggests that up to one-third of those deaths are related to malnutrition and cachexia for which there are currently no effective nutritional interventions. Weight loss is a predictor of survival in patients receiving cancer therapy and supplemental nutrition is often indicated in patients undergoing surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy. Phase I research has clearly shown that daily supplementation with HMB/Arg/Gln was effective in preventing and reversing the weight and muscle mass losses in stage IV cancer patients who were undergoing various regimens of chemotherapy. In this Phase II multicenter trial, it is proposed to include a more homogenous group of cancer patients, with diagnoses limited to lung and proximal GI-tract cancers which are notoriously known to result in significant wasting. The proposal will determine if early therapeutic interventions with HMB/Arg/Gln will result in (a) decreasing weight loss, (b) reversing muscle wasting, (c) decreasing protein turnover, (d) decreasing toxicity to chemotherapeutic agents and better adherence to chemotherapeutic regimens, and (e) improving overall feeling of well being. If as expected Phase II results confirm the effectiveness of the nutrient mixture in cancer patients, a product would be marketed for this purpose. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL APPLICATION: Since over 1.2 million cases of cancer are expected to be diagnosed this year alone (American Cancer Society), the market potential for the proposed nutritional product is very large. It is expected that Phase II will continue to support the positive findings of Phase I and that a product containing the nutrient combination in a ready-to-drink formulation would be marketed upon this confirmation. A balanced nutritional product containing high quality protein and other nutrients would likely be developed. It is envisioned that these products will be highly effective over-the-counter and/or prescription nutritional supplements for cancer patients with cachexia to improve quality of life of cancer patients.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

17 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2023). Reported award amounts total $8,355,488. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.